
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX 5880 Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1257.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 285W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5880 Ada Generation across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 440), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅25.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅223.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (440 vs 136).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌1403.8% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌78.1% higher power demand at 285W vs 160W.
- ❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023RTX 5880 Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1257.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 4.2 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 285W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅25.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅223.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (440 vs 136).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 5880 Ada Generation across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 440), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌1403.8% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.2 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌78.1% higher power demand at 285W vs 160W.
- ❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 5880 Ada Generation better than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4060 Ti make more sense than RTX 5880 Ada Generation?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 222 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 194 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 605 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 491 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 329 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 337 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 261 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 173 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 915 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 750 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 676 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 565 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 709 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 510 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 423 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 282 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 330 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 277 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 101 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and RTX 5880 Ada Generation

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX 5880 Ada Generation
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 14080 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 110 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 25,096 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the RTX 5880 Ada Generation's 25,096 — the RTX 5880 Ada Generation leads by 10.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX 5880 Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 14,080 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 69.27 TFLOPS (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2460 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 110 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) with 136 Tensor cores vs 440.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651 | 25,096+11% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 14080+224% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 69.27 TFLOPS+214% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+3% | 2460 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 176+267% |
| TMUs | 136 | 440+224% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 13.8 MB+221% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 72 MB+125% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 110+224% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 440+224% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 5880 Ada Generation lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX 5880 Ada Generation supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 5880 Ada Generation has 48 GB. The RTX 5880 Ada Generation offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 768 GB/s (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) — a 166.7% advantage for the RTX 5880 Ada Generation. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 72 MB (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) — the RTX 5880 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 48 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 768 GB/s+167% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 72 MB+125% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs NVENC 8th gen (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP8,VP9 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the RTX 5880 Ada Generation's 285W — a 56.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 650W (RTX 5880 Ada Generation). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-44% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+61% | 88.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the RTX 5880 Ada Generation launched at $6000. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 93.3% less ($5601 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4.2 (RTX 5880 Ada Generation) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 1252.4% better value. The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 5880 Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-93% | $6000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+1252% | 4.2 |
| Codename | AD106 | AD102 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | January 5 2024 |
| Ranking | #59 | #40 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












