G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs RTX A2000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs RTX A2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅68.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
✅Delivers 89.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌128.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 70W.
❌43.7% longer card at 240mm vs 167mm.

RTX A2000

2021

Why buy it

✅Draws 70W instead of 160W, a 90W reduction.
✅Measures 167mm instead of 240mm, a 73mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌
12.8% HIGHER MSRP
$450 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 29.9 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 68.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 68.2% in PassMark G3D (22,651 vs 13,464), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while RTX A2000 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 8nm, 34 vs 26 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2021. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti makes the most sense to buy today. It is $51 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $450, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 89.7% (56.8 vs 29.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs RTX A2000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX A2000

The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the RTX A2000's 13,464 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 68.2%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A2000 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1200 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 26 (RTX A2000) with 136 Tensor cores vs 104.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX A2000
G3D Mark Score	22,651+68%	13,464
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Ampere
Process Node	5 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	4352+31%	3328
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+176%	7.987 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+111%	1200 MHz
ROPs	48	48
TMUs	136+31%	104
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+30%	3.3 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB+967%	3 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	34+31%	26
Tensor Cores	136+31%	104

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX A2000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX A2000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX A2000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and 128-bit on the RTX A2000. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX A2000
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	32 MB+967%	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX A2000
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX A2000
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	7th Gen NVENC
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the RTX A2000's 70W — a 78.3% difference. The RTX A2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (RTX A2000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX A2000
TDP	160W	70W-56%
Recommended PSU	550W	500W-9%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	167mm
Height	111mm	68mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	141.6	192.3+36%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti came in at $399, while the RTX A2000 launched at $450. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti was 11.3% cheaper ($51 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 29.9 (RTX A2000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 90% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti (2023 vs 2021).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX A2000
MSRP	$399-11%	$450
Performance per Dollar	56.8+90%	29.9
Codename	AD106	GA106
Release	May 18 2023	August 10 2021
Ranking	#59	#186

Search GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on Amazon

Search RTX A2000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.