
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX A3000 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+78.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 70W.
RTX A3000 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 160W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,720 vs 22,651).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023RTX A3000 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅+78.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 160W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌128.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 70W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,720 vs 22,651).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than RTX A3000 Mobile?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A3000 Mobile still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 363 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 294 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 240 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 238 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 194 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 161 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 35 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 429 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 343 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 196 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 70 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and RTX A3000 Mobile

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX A3000 Mobile
RTX A3000 Mobile
The RTX A3000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1230 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,720 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the RTX A3000 Mobile's 12,720 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 78.1%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX A3000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4,096 (RTX A3000 Mobile). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 10.08 TFLOPS (RTX A3000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1230 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 32 (RTX A3000 Mobile) with 136 Tensor cores vs 128.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+78% | 12,720 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+6% | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+119% | 10.08 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+106% | 1230 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136+6% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+7% | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34+6% | 32 |
| Tensor Cores | 136+6% | 128 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A3000 Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX A3000 Mobile supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4 MB (RTX A3000 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX A3000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A3000 Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A3000 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the RTX A3000 Mobile's 70W — a 78.3% difference. The RTX A3000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (RTX A3000 Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 70W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6 | 181.7+28% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX A3000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | AD106 | GA104 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #59 | #205 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












