G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

✅+33.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌255.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 45W.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

2025

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 160W, a 115W reduction.
✅More future proof: Blackwell on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (16,940 vs 22,651).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

2025

Why buy it

✅+33.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 160W, a 115W reduction.
✅More future proof: Blackwell on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌255.6% higher power demand at 160W vs 45W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (16,940 vs 22,651).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 33.7% higher PassMark G3D performance, DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, and 136 vs 104 Tensor cores. It also comes from 2023 instead of 2025, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 33.7% more raw performance headroom and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $399 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 33.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is the newer 2025 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (45W vs 160W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile make more sense than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti?

Yes. RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (45W vs 160W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti. The trade-off is that GeForce RTX 4060 Ti currently gives you 33.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Benchmark Check

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
1080p
low	177 FPS	143 FPS
medium	162 FPS	123 FPS
high	142 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	61 FPS
1440p
low	143 FPS	123 FPS
medium	118 FPS	105 FPS
high	101 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	93 FPS	45 FPS
4K
low	93 FPS	46 FPS
medium	79 FPS	42 FPS
high	66 FPS	26 FPS
ultra	59 FPS	23 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
1080p
low	425 FPS	220 FPS
medium	359 FPS	187 FPS
high	292 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	237 FPS	116 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	149 FPS
medium	229 FPS	124 FPS
high	186 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	154 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	117 FPS	79 FPS
medium	95 FPS	65 FPS
high	77 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	38 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
1080p
low	855 FPS	762 FPS
medium	693 FPS	610 FPS
high	609 FPS	508 FPS
ultra	510 FPS	381 FPS
1440p
low	660 FPS	572 FPS
medium	527 FPS	457 FPS
high	452 FPS	381 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	286 FPS
4K
low	447 FPS	381 FPS
medium	355 FPS	305 FPS
high	308 FPS	254 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	191 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
1080p
low	775 FPS	350 FPS
medium	639 FPS	302 FPS
high	558 FPS	254 FPS
ultra	492 FPS	204 FPS
1440p
low	613 FPS	269 FPS
medium	503 FPS	238 FPS
high	435 FPS	201 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	158 FPS
4K
low	375 FPS	161 FPS
medium	322 FPS	136 FPS
high	298 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	255 FPS	88 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Open RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 19 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 952 MHz to 1657 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,940 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile's 16,940 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 33.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3,328 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 11.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1657 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 26 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile) with 136 Tensor cores vs 104.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
G3D Mark Score	22,651+34%	16,940
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Blackwell 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	4352+31%	3328
Compute (TFLOPS)	22.06 TFLOPS+100%	11.03 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2535 MHz+53%	1657 MHz
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	136+31%	104
L1 Cache	4.3 MB+30%	3.3 MB
L2 Cache	32 MB	32 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	34+31%	26
Tensor Cores	136+31%	104

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	32 MB	32 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+300%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Encoder	8th Gen NVENC	9th Gen NVENC
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	6th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile's 45W — a 112.2% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 650W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060 Ti	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
TDP	160W	45W-72%
Recommended PSU	550W-15%	650W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-13%	80°C
Perf/Watt	141.6	376.4+166%