GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs RTX PRO 6000

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023Core: 2310 MHzBoost: 2535 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
NVIDIA

RTX PRO 6000

2025Core: 2017 MHzBoost: 2407 MHz

Popular choices:

RTX 4060 Ti

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $8,166 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1033.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • Draws 160W instead of 600W, a 440W reduction.
  • Measures 240mm instead of 304mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 6000 across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 752), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.

RTX PRO 6000

2025

Why buy it

  • 47.6% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 452.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (752 vs 136).
  • 500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2046.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $8,565 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • 275% higher power demand at 600W vs 160W.
  • 26.7% longer card at 304mm vs 240mm.

Quick Answers

So, is RTX PRO 6000 better than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti?
Yes. RTX PRO 6000 is clearly the better overall GPU here. RTX PRO 6000 averages 47.6% more FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 42,899 vs 22,651 in G3D Mark. On top of that, RTX PRO 6000 is a 2025 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a 2023 model from an older generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
RTX PRO 6000 is about 2046.6% more expensive on MSRP at $8,565 MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and you are getting 47.6% more estimated average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data and 89.4% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, RTX PRO 6000 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 4060 Ti still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.
When does GeForce RTX 4060 Ti make more sense than RTX PRO 6000?
Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is excellent for 1080p, very strong for 1440p, and still capable at 4K with sensible settings or upscaling. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (160W vs 600W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $399 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of RTX PRO 6000. The trade-off is that RTX PRO 6000 currently gives you 89.4% higher G3D Mark and 47.6% more estimated average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 4060 Ti still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce RTX 4060 TiRTX PRO 6000
1080p
low177 FPS344 FPS
medium162 FPS328 FPS
high142 FPS277 FPS
ultra124 FPS218 FPS
1440p
low143 FPS328 FPS
medium118 FPS275 FPS
high101 FPS215 FPS
ultra93 FPS173 FPS
4K
low93 FPS195 FPS
medium79 FPS161 FPS
high66 FPS120 FPS
ultra59 FPS107 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce RTX 4060 TiRTX PRO 6000
1080p
low425 FPS955 FPS
medium359 FPS790 FPS
high292 FPS620 FPS
ultra237 FPS526 FPS
1440p
low270 FPS759 FPS
medium229 FPS643 FPS
high186 FPS526 FPS
ultra154 FPS417 FPS
4K
low117 FPS414 FPS
medium95 FPS354 FPS
high77 FPS328 FPS
ultra60 FPS283 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce RTX 4060 TiRTX PRO 6000
1080p
low855 FPS948 FPS
medium693 FPS775 FPS
high609 FPS701 FPS
ultra510 FPS606 FPS
1440p
low660 FPS731 FPS
medium527 FPS598 FPS
high452 FPS529 FPS
ultra382 FPS452 FPS
4K
low447 FPS506 FPS
medium355 FPS419 FPS
high308 FPS377 FPS
ultra255 FPS316 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce RTX 4060 TiRTX PRO 6000
1080p
low775 FPS999 FPS
medium639 FPS999 FPS
high558 FPS930 FPS
ultra492 FPS827 FPS
1440p
low613 FPS895 FPS
medium503 FPS786 FPS
high435 FPS692 FPS
ultra378 FPS595 FPS
4K
low375 FPS646 FPS
medium322 FPS574 FPS
high298 FPS512 FPS
ultra255 FPS440 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and RTX PRO 6000

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

NVIDIA

RTX PRO 6000

The RTX PRO 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42,899 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the RTX PRO 6000's 42,899 — the RTX PRO 6000 leads by 89.4%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX PRO 6000 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 24,064 (RTX PRO 6000). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 115.8 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 6000). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 188 (RTX PRO 6000) with 136 Tensor cores vs 752.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRTX PRO 6000
G3D Mark Score
22,651
42,899+89%
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Blackwell 2.0
Process Node
5 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
4352
24064+453%
Compute (TFLOPS)
22.06 TFLOPS
115.8 TFLOPS+425%
Boost Clock
2535 MHz+5%
2407 MHz
ROPs
48
176+267%
TMUs
136
752+453%
L1 Cache
4.3 MB
23.5 MB+447%
L2 Cache
32 MB
128 MB+300%
Ray Tracing Cores
34
188+453%
Tensor Cores
136
752+453%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 6000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX PRO 6000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRTX PRO 6000
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 6000 has 48 GB. The RTX PRO 6000 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 960 GB/s (RTX PRO 6000) — a 233.3% advantage for the RTX PRO 6000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 128 MB (RTX PRO 6000) — the RTX PRO 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRTX PRO 6000
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
48 GB+500%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
960 GB/s+233%
Bus Width
128-bit
384-bit+200%
L2 Cache
32 MB
128 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRTX PRO 6000
DirectX
12.2
12.2
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 6000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX PRO 6000).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRTX PRO 6000
Encoder
8th Gen NVENC
NVENC 9th Gen
Decoder
5th Gen NVDEC
NVDEC 6th Gen
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the RTX PRO 6000's 600W — a 115.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (RTX PRO 6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRTX PRO 6000
TDP
160W-73%
600W
Recommended PSU
550W
500W-9%
Power Connector
8-pin
16-pin
Length
240mm
304mm
Height
111mm
137mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
70°C-13%
80°C
Perf/Watt
141.6+98%
71.5
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 6000 launched at $8565. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 95.3% less ($8166 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 5.0 (RTX PRO 6000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 1036% better value. The RTX PRO 6000 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060 TiRTX PRO 6000
MSRP
$399-95%
$8565
Performance per Dollar
56.8+1036%
5.0
Codename
AD106
GB202
Release
May 18 2023
2025
Ranking
#59
#608