
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $8,166 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1033.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 600W, a 440W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 304mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 6000 across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 752), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
RTX PRO 6000
2025Why buy it
- ✅47.6% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅452.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (752 vs 136).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2046.6% HIGHER MSRP$8,565 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌275% higher power demand at 600W vs 160W.
- ❌26.7% longer card at 304mm vs 240mm.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023RTX PRO 6000
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $8,166 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1033.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $8,565 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 600W, a 440W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 304mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅47.6% more average FPS across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅452.9% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (752 vs 136).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 6000 across 43 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 752), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2046.6% HIGHER MSRP$8,565 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($8,565 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌275% higher power demand at 600W vs 160W.
- ❌26.7% longer card at 304mm vs 240mm.
Quick Answers
So, is RTX PRO 6000 better than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4060 Ti make more sense than RTX PRO 6000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 344 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 328 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 328 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 955 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 790 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 620 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 759 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 526 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 417 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 283 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 948 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 775 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 701 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 606 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 731 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 598 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 999 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 999 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 930 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 827 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 895 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 786 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 692 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 574 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 512 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 440 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and RTX PRO 6000

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000
The RTX PRO 6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 24064 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 600W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 188 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42,899 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the RTX PRO 6000's 42,899 — the RTX PRO 6000 leads by 89.4%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the RTX PRO 6000 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 24,064 (RTX PRO 6000). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 115.8 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 6000). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 188 (RTX PRO 6000) with 136 Tensor cores vs 752.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651 | 42,899+89% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 24064+453% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS | 115.8 TFLOPS+425% |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+5% | 2407 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 176+267% |
| TMUs | 136 | 752+453% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 23.5 MB+447% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 128 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 188+453% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 752+453% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX PRO 6000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The RTX PRO 6000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 6000 has 48 GB. The RTX PRO 6000 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 960 GB/s (RTX PRO 6000) — a 233.3% advantage for the RTX PRO 6000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 128 MB (RTX PRO 6000) — the RTX PRO 6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 48 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 960 GB/s+233% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 128 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX PRO 6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 6000). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX PRO 6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the RTX PRO 6000's 600W — a 115.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 500W (RTX PRO 6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-73% | 600W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+98% | 71.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 6000 launched at $8565. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 95.3% less ($8166 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 5.0 (RTX PRO 6000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 1036% better value. The RTX PRO 6000 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | RTX PRO 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-95% | $8565 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+1036% | 5.0 |
| Codename | AD106 | GB202 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | 2025 |
| Ranking | #59 | #608 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












