
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Tesla C2050
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+613.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 4366.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla C2050
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,176 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌526.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Tesla C2050
2011Why buy it
- ✅+613.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 4366.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (3,176 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌526.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Tesla C2050?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla C2050 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 36 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Tesla C2050

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Tesla C2050
Tesla C2050
The Tesla C2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,176 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Tesla C2050's 3,176 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 613.2%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Tesla C2050 uses Fermi, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 448 (Tesla C2050). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+613% | 3,176 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Fermi |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+871% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+2046% | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 136+143% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+389% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+4167% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla C2050 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla C2050 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2050 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2050) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+4167% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Tesla C2050's 238W — a 39.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Tesla C2050). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-33% | 238W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+965% | 13.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Tesla C2050 launched at $2499. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 84% less ($2100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1.3 (Tesla C2050) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 4269.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-84% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+4269% | 1.3 |
| Codename | AD106 | GF100 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #59 | #569 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












