
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

Tesla K20m
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+411.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,800 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3997.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla K20m
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,432 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌701.8% HIGHER MSRP$3,199 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Tesla K20m
2013Why buy it
- ✅+411.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,800 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 3997.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $3,199 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,432 vs 22,651).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌701.8% HIGHER MSRP$3,199 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than Tesla K20m?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla K20m still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 18 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 160 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 50 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and Tesla K20m

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

Tesla K20m
Tesla K20m
The Tesla K20m is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 5 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 2496 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,432 points. Launch price was $3,199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the Tesla K20m's 4,432 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 411.1%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the Tesla K20m uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 2,496 (Tesla K20m). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 3.524 TFLOPS (Tesla K20m).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+411% | 4,432 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Kepler |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+74% | 2496 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+526% | 3.524 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+20% | 40 |
| TMUs | 136 | 208+53% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+2050% | 0.2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+2460% | 1.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla K20m lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla K20m relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K20m has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1.25 MB (Tesla K20m) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+2460% | 1.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the Tesla K20m's 225W — a 33.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 350W (Tesla K20m). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-29% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+619% | 19.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Tesla K20m launched at $3199. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 87.5% less ($2800 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 1.4 (Tesla K20m) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 3957.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Tesla K20m |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-88% | $3199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+3957% | 1.4 |
| Codename | AD106 | GK110 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | January 5 2013 |
| Ranking | #59 | #470 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












