
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:

TITAN RTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023Why buy it
- ✅+12.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 606% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
TITAN RTX
2018Why buy it
- ✅15.0% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅323.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 136).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (20,095 vs 22,651).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌526.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
2023TITAN RTX
2018Why buy it
- ✅+12.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,100 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 606% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 56.8 vs 8.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅15.0% more average FPS across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅323.5% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 136).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than TITAN RTX across 45 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (136 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (20,095 vs 22,651).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 24 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌526.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.0 vs 56.8 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Ti better than TITAN RTX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is TITAN RTX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 126 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 115 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 66 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 359 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 292 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 307 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 86 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 855 FPS | 904 FPS |
| medium | 693 FPS | 723 FPS |
| high | 609 FPS | 603 FPS |
| ultra | 510 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 678 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 452 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 447 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 355 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 301 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 226 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 639 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 558 FPS | 478 FPS |
| ultra | 492 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 613 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 503 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 435 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 339 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 375 FPS | 337 FPS |
| medium | 322 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 226 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti and TITAN RTX

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.

TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX
The TITAN RTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 18 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 280W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,095 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti scores 22,651 versus the TITAN RTX's 20,095 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 12.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is built on Ada Lovelace while the TITAN RTX uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 4,608 (TITAN RTX). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (TITAN RTX). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 34 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 72 (TITAN RTX) with 136 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 22,651+13% | 20,095 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352 | 4608+6% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+35% | 16.31 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+43% | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 136 | 288+112% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 4.5 MB+5% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 72+112% |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | 576+324% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The TITAN RTX lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The TITAN RTX supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the TITAN RTX has 24 GB. The TITAN RTX offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 672 GB/s (TITAN RTX) — a 133.3% advantage for the TITAN RTX. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 6 MB (TITAN RTX) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 672 GB/s+133% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+433% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (TITAN RTX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (TITAN RTX). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs NVDEC (4th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (TITAN RTX).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 8th Gen NVENC | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | NVDEC (4th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 160W versus the TITAN RTX's 280W — a 54.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 650W (TITAN RTX). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-43% | 280W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 116mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 141.6+97% | 71.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the TITAN RTX launched at $2499. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti costs 84% less ($2100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 56.8 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) vs 8.0 (TITAN RTX) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 610% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | TITAN RTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-84% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 56.8+610% | 8.0 |
| Codename | AD106 | TU102 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | December 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #59 | #91 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












