
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 304), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅54.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅216.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (304 vs 96).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅54.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅216.7% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (304 vs 96).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 304), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile better than GeForce RTX 4060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 4060 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 149 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 70 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 438 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 383 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 220 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 131 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 884 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 735 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 661 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 570 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 697 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 433 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 474 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 347 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 282 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 723 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 655 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 573 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 528 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 581 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 520 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 456 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 408 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 296 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1335 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 9728 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 76 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,048 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile's 27,048 — the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile leads by 38.4%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 9,728 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 32.98 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1695 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 76 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) with 96 Tensor cores vs 304.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548 | 27,048+38% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 9728+217% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS | 32.98 TFLOPS+118% |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+45% | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 112+133% |
| TMUs | 96 | 304+217% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 9.5 MB+217% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 64 MB+167% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 76+217% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 304+217% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smooth motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 576 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) — a 111.8% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 64 MB (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 576 GB/s+112% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 64 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile's 120W — a 4.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-4% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-9% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0 | 225.4+33% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












