
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 5050
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅8.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅20% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (96 vs 80).
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 241mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌20.1% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
GeForce RTX 5050
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 96), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023GeForce RTX 5050
2025Why buy it
- ✅8.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅20% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (96 vs 80).
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 241mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Blackwell on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌20.1% HIGHER MSRP$299 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (80 vs 96), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than GeForce RTX 5050?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 5050 make more sense than GeForce RTX 4060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 161 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 166 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 165 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 54 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 769 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 615 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 513 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 536 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 379 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 288 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 300 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 192 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 729 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 606 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 513 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 384 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 557 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 288 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 192 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and GeForce RTX 5050

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

GeForce RTX 5050
GeForce RTX 5050
The GeForce RTX 5050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 24 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2317 MHz to 2572 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,087 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the GeForce RTX 5050's 17,087 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 14.4%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 5050 uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 5050). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 13.17 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5050). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2572 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 5050) with 96 Tensor cores vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+14% | 17,087 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+20% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+15% | 13.17 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz | 2572 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+20% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+20% | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 24 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24+20% | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | 96+20% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the GeForce RTX 5050 is on a newer tier with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the GeForce RTX 4060 tops out at DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The GeForce RTX 5050 supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14% |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 4)+14% |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 320 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5050) — a 17.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5050. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 320 GB/s+18% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 24 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 5050). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 9th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 5050). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 5050).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the GeForce RTX 5050's 130W — a 12.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 5050). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-12% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 450W-18% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-3% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+29% | 131.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 5050 launched at $249. The GeForce RTX 5050 costs 16.7% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 68.6 (GeForce RTX 5050) — the GeForce RTX 5050 offers 4.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 5050 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GeForce RTX 5050 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $249-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4 | 68.6+5% |
| Codename | AD107 | GB207 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | June 24 2025 |
| Ranking | #84 | #112 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












