GeForce RTX 4060 vs GRID K160Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅+3012.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 1201.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

GRID K160Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $174 less on MSRP ($125 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (628 vs 19,548).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

GRID K160Q

2013

Why buy it

✅+3012.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 1201.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 5.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $174 less on MSRP ($125 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (628 vs 19,548).
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than GRID K160Q?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 19,548 vs 628 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while GRID K160Q is a 2013 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2013, 3012.7% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 512 MB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 4060 is about 139.2% more expensive on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $125 MSRP, and you are getting 3012.7% higher G3D Mark. GRID K160Q really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is GRID K160Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. GRID K160Q is 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM, 628 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Benchmark Check

GRID K160Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	GRID K160Q
1080p
low	167 FPS	28 FPS
medium	152 FPS	23 FPS
high	134 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	14 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	21 FPS
medium	114 FPS	17 FPS
high	99 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	11 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	14 FPS
medium	74 FPS	11 FPS
high	62 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	7 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open GRID K160Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	GRID K160Q
1080p
low	392 FPS	28 FPS
medium	334 FPS	23 FPS
high	268 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	14 FPS
1440p
low	240 FPS	21 FPS
medium	209 FPS	17 FPS
high	169 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	11 FPS
4K
low	119 FPS	14 FPS
medium	98 FPS	11 FPS
high	82 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	7 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open GRID K160Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	GRID K160Q
1080p
low	812 FPS	28 FPS
medium	642 FPS	23 FPS
high	551 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	14 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	21 FPS
medium	443 FPS	17 FPS
high	379 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	11 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	14 FPS
medium	297 FPS	11 FPS
high	234 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	7 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open GRID K160Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	GRID K160Q
1080p
low	746 FPS	28 FPS
medium	613 FPS	23 FPS
high	536 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	14 FPS
1440p
low	594 FPS	21 FPS
medium	486 FPS	17 FPS
high	421 FPS	14 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	11 FPS
4K
low	358 FPS	14 FPS
medium	308 FPS	11 FPS
high	285 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	220 FPS	7 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open GRID K160Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and GRID K160Q

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

GRID K160Q

The GRID K160Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 628 points. Launch price was $937.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the GRID K160Q's 628 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 3012.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GRID K160Q uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1,536 (GRID K160Q). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K160Q).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	GRID K160Q
G3D Mark Score	19,548+3013%	628
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Kepler
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3072+100%	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS+560%	2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	96	128+33%
L1 Cache	3 MB+2208%	0.13 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+4700%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GRID K160Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID K160Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	GRID K160Q
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K160Q has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K160Q) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	GRID K160Q
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+1500%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	24 MB+4700%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the GRID K160Q's 225W — a 64.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (GRID K160Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	GRID K160Q
TDP	115W-49%	225W
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	73°C	—
Perf/Watt	170.0+5971%	2.8

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the GRID K160Q launched at $125. The GRID K160Q costs 58.2% less ($174 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 5.0 (GRID K160Q) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 1208% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).