GeForce RTX 4060 vs GRID M3-3020

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs GRID M3-3020 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs GRID M3-3020: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅+681.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $701 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2515.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

GRID M3-3020

2016

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,500 vs 19,548).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
234.4% HIGHER MSRP
$1,000 MSRPvs$299 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 681.9% in PassMark G3D (19,548 vs 2,500), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GRID M3-3020 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and 24 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $701 cheaper on MSRP at $299 vs $1,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2515.1% (65.4 vs 2.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs GRID M3-3020 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

GRID M3-3020

The GRID M3-3020 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the GRID M3-3020's 2,500 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 681.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GRID M3-3020 uses Maxwell, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 640 (GRID M3-3020). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M3-3020). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1306 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	GRID M3-3020
G3D Mark Score	19,548+682%	2,500
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Maxwell
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3072+380%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS+804%	1.672 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2460 MHz+88%	1306 MHz
ROPs	48+200%	16
TMUs	96+140%	40
L1 Cache	3 MB+868%	0.31 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+1100%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GRID M3-3020 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID M3-3020 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	GRID M3-3020
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M3-3020 carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 and 64-bit on the GRID M3-3020. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (GRID M3-3020) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	GRID M3-3020
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	24 MB+1100%	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the GRID M3-3020's 250W — a 74% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (GRID M3-3020). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	GRID M3-3020
TDP	115W-54%	250W
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	73°C	—
Perf/Watt	170.0+1600%	10.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 came in at $299, while the GRID M3-3020 launched at $1000. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 was 70.1% cheaper ($701 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2.5 (GRID M3-3020) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 2516% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2016).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	GRID M3-3020
MSRP	$299-70%	$1000
Performance per Dollar	65.4+2516%	2.5
Codename	AD107	GM107
Release	May 18 2023	May 18 2016
Ranking	#84	#587

Search GeForce RTX 4060 on Amazon

Search GRID M3-3020 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.