
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

GRID M6-1Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+844.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,201 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 4639.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌23900% longer card at 240mm vs 1mm.
GRID M6-1Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 240mm, a 239mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,069 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌401.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,500 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4060
2023GRID M6-1Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅+844.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,201 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 4639.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 1.4 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 240mm, a 239mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌23900% longer card at 240mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,069 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌401.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,500 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than GRID M6-1Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID M6-1Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | GRID M6-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | GRID M6-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 23 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | GRID M6-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 23 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | GRID M6-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 23 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and GRID M6-1Q

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

GRID M6-1Q
GRID M6-1Q
The GRID M6-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,069 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the GRID M6-1Q's 2,069 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 844.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the GRID M6-1Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,048 (GRID M6-1Q). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M6-1Q). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GRID M6-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+845% | 2,069 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+50% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+213% | 4.825 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+109% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 128+33% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+300% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GRID M6-1Q lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID M6-1Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GRID M6-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M6-1Q has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (GRID M6-1Q) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GRID M6-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12_1 (GRID M6-1Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GRID M6-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the GRID M6-1Q's 225W — a 64.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (GRID M6-1Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GRID M6-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-49% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+1748% | 9.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the GRID M6-1Q launched at $1500. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 80.1% less ($1201 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1.4 (GRID M6-1Q) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 4571.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | GRID M6-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-80% | $1500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+4571% | 1.4 |
| Codename | AD107 | GM204 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #84 | #525 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












