
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Intel Arc Pro A60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+105.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $81 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 161.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Intel Arc Pro A60
2023Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,493 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌27.1% HIGHER MSRP$380 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Intel Arc Pro A60
2023Why buy it
- ✅+105.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $81 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 161.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 25.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $380 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,493 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌27.1% HIGHER MSRP$380 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Intel Arc Pro A60?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Intel Arc Pro A60 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 22 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 342 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 107 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 39 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Intel Arc Pro A60

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel Arc Pro A60
Intel Arc Pro A60
The Intel Arc Pro A60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 6 2023. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,493 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Intel Arc Pro A60's 9,493 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 105.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Intel Arc Pro A60 uses Generation 12.7, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,048 (Intel Arc Pro A60). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 8.397 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A60). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2050 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 16 (Intel Arc Pro A60) with 96 Tensor cores vs 256.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+106% | 9,493 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+50% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+80% | 8.397 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+20% | 2050 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 128+33% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+100% | 12 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24+50% | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 256+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Intel Arc Pro A60 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel Arc Pro A60 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 MB (Intel Arc Pro A60) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+100% | 12 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (Intel Arc Pro A60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs Intel Xe Media Engine (Intel Arc Pro A60). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs Intel Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Intel Arc Pro A60).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | Intel Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | Intel Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Intel Arc Pro A60's 130W — a 12.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro A60). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-12% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-3% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+133% | 73.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 launched at $380. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 21.3% less ($81 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 25.0 (Intel Arc Pro A60) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 161.6% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel Arc Pro A60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-21% | $380 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+162% | 25.0 |
| Codename | AD107 | DG2-256 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | June 6 2023 |
| Ranking | #84 | #275 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












