
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- β +1171% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022β2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β666.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 15W.
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
2014Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 115W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (1,538 vs 19,548).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
2014Why buy it
- β +1171% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022β2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 115W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β666.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (1,538 vs 19,548).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 17 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 15 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,538 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200's 1,538 β the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 1171%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses Generation 8.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 384 (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.8448 TFLOPS (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1100 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+1171% | 1,538 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Generation 8.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+700% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+1689% | 0.8448 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+124% | 1100 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+700% | 6 |
| TMUs | 96+100% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200's 15W β a 153.8% difference. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1W (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 15W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 240mm | β |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 73Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+66% | 102.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 launched at $0. The Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 costs 100+% less ($299 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs Infinity (Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200) β the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | AD107 | Broadwell GT3e |
| Release | May 18 2023 | September 5 2014 |
| Ranking | #84 | #763 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












