GeForce RTX 4060
Intel UHD Graphics 617
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Intel UHD Graphics 617 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Intel UHD Graphics 617 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Intel UHD Graphics 617: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+2286.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌666.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 15W.
- ❌23900% longer card at 240mm vs 1mm.
Intel UHD Graphics 617
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 115W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 240mm, a 239mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (819 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Intel UHD Graphics 617 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Intel UHD Graphics 617
The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in November 7 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 819 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Intel UHD Graphics 617's 819 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 2286.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Intel UHD Graphics 617 uses Generation 9.5, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+2287% | 819 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+1500% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+3648% | 0.4032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+134% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+1500% | 3 |
| TMUs | 96+300% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 617 carries 0 MB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 and System on the Intel UHD Graphics 617.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12_1 (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs QuickSync (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs QuickSync.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | QuickSync |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 617's 15W — a 153.8% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 617 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 617). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 240mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 15W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 240mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+211% | 54.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 came in at $299, while the Intel UHD Graphics 617 launched at $0. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 617 was 100+% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 617) — the Intel UHD Graphics 617 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Intel UHD Graphics 617 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | AD107 | Amber Lake GT2 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | November 7 2018 |
| Ranking | #84 | #921 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 and Intel UHD Graphics 617
