GeForce RTX 4060 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

2023Core: 1830 MHzBoost: 2460 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

2013Core: 200 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

  • +1567.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • Delivers 736.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 7.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 283.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 30W.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $149 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 115W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,172 vs 19,548).
  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2013 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.8 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4060 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1567.9% in PassMark G3D (19,548 vs 1,172), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 22nm, and 24 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $149 more expensive on MSRP at $299 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 736.7% (65.4 vs 7.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Iris Pro Graphics 5200's 1,172 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 1567.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses Generation 7.5, both on 5 nm vs 22 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1200 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Iris Pro Graphics 5200
G3D Mark Score
19,548+1568%
1,172
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Generation 7.5
Process Node
5 nm
22 nm
Shading Units
3072+860%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
15.11 TFLOPS+1867%
0.768 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2460 MHz+105%
1200 MHz
ROPs
48+1100%
4
TMUs
96+140%
40

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 carries 0 MB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 and System on the Iris Pro Graphics 5200.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Iris Pro Graphics 5200
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
272 GB/s
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 5200's 30W — a 117.2% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Iris Pro Graphics 5200
TDP
115W
30W-74%
Recommended PSU
550W
1W-100%
Power Connector
8-pin
Integrated
Length
240mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
73°C
Perf/Watt
170.0+335%
39.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 came in at $299, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150. On MSRP, Iris Pro Graphics 5200 was 49.8% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 7.8 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 738.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Iris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP
$299
$150-50%
Performance per Dollar
65.4+738%
7.8
Codename
AD107
Haswell GT3e
Release
May 18 2023
May 27 2013
Ranking
#84
#835

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.