GeForce RTX 4060
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+1135.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 519.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 10.5 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌666.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 15W.
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $149 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 115W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (1,582 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2014 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Iris Pro Graphics P6300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Iris Pro Graphics P6300
The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Iris Pro Graphics P6300's 1,582 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 1135.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 uses Generation 8.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 384 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.6144 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 800 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+1136% | 1,582 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Generation 8.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+700% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+2359% | 0.6144 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+208% | 800 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+700% | 6 |
| TMUs | 96+100% | 48 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 carries 0 MB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 and System on the Iris Pro Graphics P6300.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (11_1) (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Iris Pro Graphics P6300's 15W — a 153.8% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics P6300). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 15W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-3% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+61% | 105.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 came in at $299, while the Iris Pro Graphics P6300 launched at $150. On MSRP, Iris Pro Graphics P6300 was 49.8% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 10.5 (Iris Pro Graphics P6300) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 522.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $150-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+523% | 10.5 |
| Codename | AD107 | Broadwell GT3e |
| Release | May 18 2023 | September 5 2014 |
| Ranking | #84 | #755 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 and Iris Pro Graphics P6300
