
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Iris Xe Graphics G7
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- β +490.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 294.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022β2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β283.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 30W.
Iris Xe Graphics G7
2020Why buy it
- β Costs $99 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- β Draws 30W instead of 115W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (3,311 vs 19,548).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Iris Xe Graphics G7
2020Why buy it
- β +490.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 294.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022β2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Costs $99 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- β Draws 30W instead of 115W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β283.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (3,311 vs 19,548).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2020-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Iris Xe Graphics G7?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Iris Xe Graphics G7 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 37 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Iris Xe Graphics G7

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,311 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7's 3,311 β the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 490.4%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 5 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 96 (Iris Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+490% | 3,311 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+3100% | 96 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs QuickSync (Iris Xe Graphics G7). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Iris Xe Graphics G7).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | QuickSync |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | QuickSync |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Iris Xe Graphics G7's 30W β a 117.2% difference. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1W (Iris Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 73Β°C vs 85Β°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 30W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 240mm | β |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 73Β°C-14% | 85Β°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+54% | 110.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Iris Xe Graphics G7 launched at $200. The Iris Xe Graphics G7 costs 33.1% less ($99 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 16.6 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) β the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 294% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $200-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+294% | 16.6 |
| Codename | AD107 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #84 | #493 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












