
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

L2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+257.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,701 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2291.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.
L2
2023Why buy it
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,467 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌568.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4060
2023L2
2023Why buy it
- ✅+257.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,701 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2291.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (5,467 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌568.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than L2?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is L2 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 62 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 62 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and L2

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

L2
L2
The L2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 16 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1440 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 11776 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 92 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,467 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the L2's 5,467 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 257.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the L2 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 11,776 (L2). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 59.35 TFLOPS (L2). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2520 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 92 (L2) with 96 Tensor cores vs 368.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+258% | 5,467 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 11776+283% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS | 59.35 TFLOPS+293% |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz | 2520 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 48 | 128+167% |
| TMUs | 96 | 368+283% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 11.5 MB+283% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 96 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 92+283% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 368+283% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The L2 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The L2 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the L2 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 96 MB (L2) — the L2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 96 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12_2 (L2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_2 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC 8th Gen (L2). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (L2).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the L2's 275W — a 82.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (L2). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-58% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+754% | 19.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the L2 launched at $2000. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 85% less ($1701 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2.7 (L2) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 2322.2% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | L2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-85% | $2000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+2322% | 2.7 |
| Codename | AD107 | AD102 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | November 16 2023 |
| Ranking | #84 | #189 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












