
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

L4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+92.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,046 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,345 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1410% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 4.3 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,345 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌59.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 72W.
- ❌42% longer card at 240mm vs 169mm.
L4
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 72W instead of 115W, a 43W reduction.
- ✅Measures 169mm instead of 240mm, a 71mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,153 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌684.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,345 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.3 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($2,345 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023L4
2023Why buy it
- ✅+92.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,046 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,345 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1410% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 4.3 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,345 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 72W instead of 115W, a 43W reduction.
- ✅Measures 169mm instead of 240mm, a 71mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌59.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 72W.
- ❌42% longer card at 240mm vs 169mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,153 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌684.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,345 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.3 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($2,345 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than L4?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is L4 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 182 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 66 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 457 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 114 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 223 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 93 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and L4

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

L4
L4
The L4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 7424 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 72W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,153 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the L4's 10,153 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 92.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the L4 uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 7,424 (L4). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 30.29 TFLOPS (L4). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2040 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 60 (L4) with 96 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+93% | 10,153 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 7424+142% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS | 30.29 TFLOPS+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+21% | 2040 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 80+67% |
| TMUs | 96 | 240+150% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 7.5 MB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 48 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 60+150% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 240+150% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The L4 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The L4 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 48 MB (L4) — the L4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB | 48 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (L4). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (L4). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC (4x). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (L4).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 5th Gen NVDEC (4x) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the L4's 72W — a 46% difference. The L4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (L4). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 169mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 72W-37% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 169mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-3% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+21% | 141.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the L4 launched at $2345. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 87.2% less ($2046 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4.3 (L4) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 1420.9% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | L4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-87% | $2345 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+1421% | 4.3 |
| Codename | AD107 | AD104 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | March 21 2023 |
| Ranking | #84 | #259 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












