
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

M1 8-Core GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- β +291% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- β 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- β More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022β2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β283.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 30W.
M1 8-Core GPU
2020Why buy it
- β Draws 30W instead of 115W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (5,000 vs 19,548).
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- βWeaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023M1 8-Core GPU
2020Why buy it
- β +291% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- β 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- β More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022β2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Draws 30W instead of 115W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β283.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (5,000 vs 19,548).
- βLess VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- βWeaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than M1 8-Core GPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is M1 8-Core GPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 44 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 33 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 56 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 40 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and M1 8-Core GPU

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
The M1 8-Core GPU is manufactured by Apple. It was released in November 10 2020. The core clock speed is 1278 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the M1 8-Core GPU's 5,000 β the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 291%. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 8 (M1 8-Core GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+291% | 5,000 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+38300% | 8 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The M1 8-Core GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The M1 8-Core GPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the M1 8-Core GPU has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 68 GB/s (M1 8-Core GPU) β a 300% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 128-bit vs Unified.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s+300% | 68 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | Unified |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs N/A (M1 8-Core GPU). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.1 (Rosetta 2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+12% | 4.1 (Rosetta 2) |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs Apple M1 Video Encoder (M1 8-Core GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs Apple M1 Video Decoder. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,HEVC,ProRes,ProRes RAW (M1 8-Core GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | Apple M1 Video Encoder |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | Apple M1 Video Decoder |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,ProRes,ProRes RAW |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the M1 8-Core GPU's 30W β a 117.2% difference. The M1 8-Core GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (M1 8-Core GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 30W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | β |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 73Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+2% | 166.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the M1 8-Core GPU launched at $0. The M1 8-Core GPU costs 100+% less ($299 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs Infinity (M1 8-Core GPU) β the M1 8-Core GPU offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | M1 8-Core GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | AD107 | β |
| Release | May 18 2023 | November 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #84 | #428 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












