
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Moore Threads MTT S80
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+677.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 576.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 9.7 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $260 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Moore Threads MTT S80
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $39 less on MSRP ($260 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,513 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: older-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($260 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Moore Threads MTT S80
Why buy it
- ✅+677.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 576.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 9.7 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $260 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $39 less on MSRP ($260 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,513 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: older-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.7 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($260 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Moore Threads MTT S80?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Moore Threads MTT S80 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 28 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 28 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 28 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Moore Threads MTT S80

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Moore Threads MTT S80
Moore Threads MTT S80
The Moore Threads MTT S80 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,513 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Moore Threads MTT S80's 2,513 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 677.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Moore Threads MTT S80 uses MUSA, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4,096 (Moore Threads MTT S80). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 14.75 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S80).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+678% | 2,513 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | MUSA |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 4096+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+2% | 14.75 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 256+433% |
| TMUs | 96 | 256+167% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+500% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Moore Threads MTT S80 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Moore Threads MTT S80 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Moore Threads MTT S80 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4 MB (Moore Threads MTT S80) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+500% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MUSA Gen2 (Moore Threads MTT S80). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs MUSA Gen2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Moore Threads MTT S80).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | MUSA Gen2 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | MUSA Gen2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Moore Threads MTT S80's 255W — a 75.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 550W (Moore Threads MTT S80). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 285mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-55% | 255W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 550W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 285mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+1617% | 9.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Moore Threads MTT S80 launched at $260. The Moore Threads MTT S80 costs 13% less ($39 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 9.7 (Moore Threads MTT S80) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 574.2% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Moore Threads MTT S80 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $260-13% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+574% | 9.7 |
| Codename | AD107 | Chunxiao |
| Release | May 18 2023 | sem dados |
| Ranking | #84 | #635 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













