GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro FX 560

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro FX 560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro FX 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅4861.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 17047.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅6300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 128 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌23900% longer card at 240mm vs 1mm.

Quadro FX 560

2008

Why buy it

✅Measures 1mm instead of 240mm, a 239mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 4861.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 17047.4% in PassMark G3D (19,548 vs 114), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 128 MB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Quadro FX 560 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 55nm, and 24 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $299 vs $299, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 17047.4% (65.4 vs 0.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro FX 560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Quadro FX 560

The Quadro FX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Quadro FX 560's 114 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 17047.4%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro FX 560 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 240 (Quadro FX 560). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 560).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro FX 560
G3D Mark Score	19,548+17047%	114
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	3072+1180%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS+2329%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	96+20%	80
L2 Cache	24 MB+9500%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro FX 560 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 560 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro FX 560
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 560 carries 128 MB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 6300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 560. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 560) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro FX 560
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+6300%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	24 MB+9500%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 9_0c (Quadro FX 560). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro FX 560
DirectX	12 Ultimate+33%	9_0c
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Quadro FX 560's 189W — a 48.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Quadro FX 560). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro FX 560
TDP	115W-39%	189W
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	1mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	73°C	—
Perf/Watt	170.0+28233%	0.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 came in at $299, while the Quadro FX 560 launched at $299. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.4 (Quadro FX 560) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 16250% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro FX 560
MSRP	$299	$299
Performance per Dollar	65.4+16250%	0.4
Codename	AD107	GT200B
Release	May 18 2023	November 11 2008
Ranking	#84	#815

Search GeForce RTX 4060 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 560 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.