G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro K2000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro K2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅1159.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2375.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌125.5% higher power demand at 115W vs 51W.
❌18.8% longer card at 240mm vs 202mm.

Quadro K2000

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 51W instead of 115W, a 64W reduction.
✅Measures 202mm instead of 240mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
100.3% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$299 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1159.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1135.7% in PassMark G3D (19,548 vs 1,582), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Quadro K2000 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and 24 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $300 cheaper on MSRP at $299 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2375.4% (65.4 vs 2.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro K2000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Quadro K2000

The Quadro K2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Quadro K2000's 1,582 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 1135.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro K2000 uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 384 (Quadro K2000). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro K2000
G3D Mark Score	19,548+1136%	1,582
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Kepler
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3072+700%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS+1962%	0.7327 TFLOPS
ROPs	48+200%	16
TMUs	96+200%	32
L1 Cache	3 MB+9900%	0.03 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+9500%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro K2000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K2000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro K2000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K2000 carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 and 64-bit on the Quadro K2000. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro K2000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro K2000
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	24 MB+9500%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro K2000
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC 1st gen (Quadro K2000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264 (Quadro K2000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro K2000
Encoder	NVENC 8th gen	NVENC 1st gen
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	NVDEC 1st gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Quadro K2000's 51W — a 77.1% difference. The Quadro K2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Quadro K2000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 202mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro K2000
TDP	115W	51W-56%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	202mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	73°C	70°C-4%
Perf/Watt	170.0+448%	31.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 came in at $299, while the Quadro K2000 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 was 50.1% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2.6 (Quadro K2000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 2415.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro K2000
MSRP	$299-50%	$599
Performance per Dollar	65.4+2415%	2.6
Codename	AD107	GK107
Release	May 18 2023	March 1 2013
Ranking	#84	#756

Search GeForce RTX 4060 on Amazon

Search Quadro K2000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.