GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro K3100M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅369.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌53.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 75W.

Quadro K3100M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 115W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Quadro K3100M

2013

Why buy it

✅369.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 115W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌53.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 75W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Quadro K3100M?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4060 averages 369.2% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 19,548 vs 2,283 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Quadro K3100M is a 2013 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2013, 756.2% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $299 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 369.2% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 756.2% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro K3100M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro K3100M is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around an unclear MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Benchmark Check

Quadro K3100M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro K3100M
1080p
low	167 FPS	78 FPS
medium	152 FPS	68 FPS
high	134 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	35 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	70 FPS
medium	114 FPS	61 FPS
high	99 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	28 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	24 FPS
medium	74 FPS	23 FPS
high	62 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	13 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Quadro K3100M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro K3100M
1080p
low	392 FPS	68 FPS
medium	334 FPS	46 FPS
high	268 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	21 FPS
1440p
low	240 FPS	38 FPS
medium	209 FPS	21 FPS
high	169 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	11 FPS
4K
low	119 FPS	14 FPS
medium	98 FPS	8 FPS
high	82 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	5 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Quadro K3100M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro K3100M
1080p
low	812 FPS	103 FPS
medium	642 FPS	82 FPS
high	551 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	51 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	77 FPS
medium	443 FPS	62 FPS
high	379 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	39 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	51 FPS
medium	297 FPS	41 FPS
high	234 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	26 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Quadro K3100M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro K3100M
1080p
low	746 FPS	103 FPS
medium	613 FPS	82 FPS
high	536 FPS	68 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	51 FPS
1440p
low	594 FPS	77 FPS
medium	486 FPS	62 FPS
high	421 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	39 FPS
4K
low	358 FPS	51 FPS
medium	308 FPS	41 FPS
high	285 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	220 FPS	23 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Quadro K3100M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Quadro K3100M

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Quadro K3100M

The Quadro K3100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,283 points. Launch price was $1,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Quadro K3100M's 2,283 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 756.2%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro K3100M uses Kepler, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 768 (Quadro K3100M). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1.084 TFLOPS (Quadro K3100M).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro K3100M
G3D Mark Score	19,548+756%	2,283
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Kepler
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3072+300%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS+1294%	1.084 TFLOPS
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	96+50%	64
L1 Cache	3 MB+4900%	0.06 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+4700%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro K3100M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K3100M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro K3100M
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K3100M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K3100M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro K3100M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	24 MB+4700%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Quadro K3100M's 75W — a 42.1% difference. The Quadro K3100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Quadro K3100M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro K3100M
TDP	115W	75W-35%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	73°C	—
Perf/Watt	170.0+459%	30.4