
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Quadro M4000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+192.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $492 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 674.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌15% higher power demand at 115W vs 100W.
Quadro M4000
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 115W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,679 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌164.5% HIGHER MSRP$791 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($791 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Quadro M4000
2015Why buy it
- ✅+192.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $492 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 674.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $791 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 115W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌15% higher power demand at 115W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,679 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌164.5% HIGHER MSRP$791 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($791 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Quadro M4000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M4000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 30 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 225 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 75 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 219 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Quadro M4000

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Quadro M4000
Quadro M4000
The Quadro M4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,679 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Quadro M4000's 6,679 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 192.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro M4000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1 (Quadro M4000). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1013 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+193% | 6,679 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+140% | 1,280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+505% | 2.496 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+143% | 1013 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96+20% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+538% | 0.47 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro M4000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M4000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro M4000) — a 28.9% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (Quadro M4000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s+29% | 211 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M4000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 1st Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro M4000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 5th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 1st Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Quadro M4000's 100W — a 14% difference. The Quadro M4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Quadro M4000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 82°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 100W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-11% | 82°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+154% | 66.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Quadro M4000 launched at $791. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 62.2% less ($492 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 8.4 (Quadro M4000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 678.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro M4000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-62% | $791 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+679% | 8.4 |
| Codename | AD107 | GM204 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #84 | #392 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












