G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅+66.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $4,700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2677% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quadro M6000

2015

Why buy it

✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,769 vs 19,548).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
1571.9% HIGHER MSRP
$4,999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Quadro M6000

2015

Why buy it

✅+66.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $4,700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2677% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,769 vs 19,548).
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
1571.9% HIGHER MSRP
$4,999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Quadro M6000?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 19,548 vs 11,769 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Quadro M6000 is a 2015 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015, 66.1% more raw performance headroom, better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 5nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 is about $4,700 cheaper on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $4,999 MSRP, and you are getting 66.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 2677%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro M6000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro M6000 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $4,999 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Benchmark Check

Quadro M6000 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro M6000
1080p
low	167 FPS	154 FPS
medium	152 FPS	133 FPS
high	134 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	69 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	124 FPS
medium	114 FPS	106 FPS
high	99 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	50 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	42 FPS
medium	74 FPS	38 FPS
high	62 FPS	24 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	20 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Quadro M6000

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro M6000
1080p
low	392 FPS	202 FPS
medium	334 FPS	178 FPS
high	268 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	240 FPS	135 FPS
medium	209 FPS	108 FPS
high	169 FPS	85 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	65 FPS
4K
low	119 FPS	61 FPS
medium	98 FPS	51 FPS
high	82 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	37 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Quadro M6000

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro M6000
1080p
low	812 FPS	530 FPS
medium	642 FPS	424 FPS
high	551 FPS	353 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	265 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	397 FPS
medium	443 FPS	318 FPS
high	379 FPS	265 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	199 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	265 FPS
medium	297 FPS	212 FPS
high	234 FPS	177 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	132 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Quadro M6000

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro M6000
1080p
low	746 FPS	286 FPS
medium	613 FPS	246 FPS
high	536 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	163 FPS
1440p
low	594 FPS	212 FPS
medium	486 FPS	188 FPS
high	421 FPS	154 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	117 FPS
4K
low	358 FPS	120 FPS
medium	308 FPS	96 FPS
high	285 FPS	79 FPS
ultra	220 FPS	61 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Quadro M6000

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Quadro M6000

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Quadro M6000

The Quadro M6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,769 points. Launch price was $4,199.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Quadro M6000's 11,769 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 66.1%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro M6000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1114 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro M6000
G3D Mark Score	19,548+66%	11,769
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3072	3072
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS+121%	6.844 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2460 MHz+121%	1114 MHz
ROPs	48	96+100%
TMUs	96	192+100%
L1 Cache	3 MB+173%	1.1 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+700%	3 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro M6000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M6000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro M6000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 has 12 GB. The Quadro M6000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000) — a 16.5% advantage for the Quadro M6000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro M6000
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	12 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	272 GB/s	317 GB/s+17%
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	24 MB+700%	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro M6000
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12/1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+2%	4.5
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro M6000
Encoder	NVENC 8th gen	NVENC 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Quadro M6000's 250W — a 74% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (Quadro M6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro M6000
TDP	115W-54%	250W
Recommended PSU	550W	500W-9%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	267mm
Height	111mm	112mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	73°C-9%	80°C
Perf/Watt	170.0+261%	47.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Quadro M6000 launched at $4999. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 94% less ($4700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2.4 (Quadro M6000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 2625% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).