
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Quadro P3200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+127.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 281.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌53.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 75W.
Quadro P3200
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 115W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,578 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌67.2% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Quadro P3200
2018Why buy it
- ✅+127.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 281.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 17.2 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 115W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌53.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (8,578 vs 19,548).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌67.2% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Quadro P3200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P3200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 238 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 48 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 386 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 232 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 193 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 75 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 61 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Quadro P3200

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200
The Quadro P3200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1328 MHz to 1543 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,578 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Quadro P3200's 8,578 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 127.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro P3200 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1,792 (Quadro P3200). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1543 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+128% | 8,578 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+71% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+173% | 5.53 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+59% | 1543 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 112+17% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+355% | 0.66 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1500% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P3200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P3200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P3200 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1500% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (Quadro P3200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro P3200). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC 3rd Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.265,H.264 (Quadro P3200).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC 3rd Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.265,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Quadro P3200's 75W — a 42.1% difference. The Quadro P3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (Quadro P3200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 75W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-9% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+49% | 114.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Quadro P3200 launched at $500. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 40.2% less ($201 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 17.2 (Quadro P3200) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 280.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro P3200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-40% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+280% | 17.2 |
| Codename | AD107 | GP104 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #84 | #304 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












