GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro P620

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

2023Core: 1830 MHzBoost: 2460 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P620

2018Core: 1177 MHzBoost: 1443 MHz
Similar parts
··

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro P620 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro P620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro P620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

  • 357.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 200.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 187.5% higher power demand at 115W vs 40W.
  • 65.5% longer card at 240mm vs 145mm.

Quadro P620

2018

Why buy it

  • Costs $129 less on MSRP ($170 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • Draws 40W instead of 115W, a 75W reduction.
  • Measures 145mm instead of 240mm, a 95mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.8 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 357.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 428.6% in PassMark G3D (19,548 vs 3,698), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Quadro P620 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 14nm, and 24 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $129 more expensive on MSRP at $299 vs $170, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 200.5% (65.4 vs 21.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro P620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

NVIDIA

Quadro P620

The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Quadro P620's 3,698 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 428.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro P620 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 512 (Quadro P620). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1443 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Quadro P620
G3D Mark Score
19,548+429%
3,698
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Pascal
Process Node
5 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
3072+500%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
15.11 TFLOPS+922%
1.478 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2460 MHz+70%
1443 MHz
ROPs
48+200%
16
TMUs
96+200%
32
L1 Cache
3 MB+1479%
0.19 MB
L2 Cache
24 MB+2300%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro P620 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P620 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Quadro P620
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P620 carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 and 64-bit on the Quadro P620. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1 MB (Quadro P620) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Quadro P620
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+300%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
24 MB+2300%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (FL12_1) (Quadro P620). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Quadro P620
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 (FL12_1)
Vulkan
1.3
1.4+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P620). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro P620).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Quadro P620
Encoder
NVENC 8th gen
NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder
NVDEC 5th gen
NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Quadro P620's 40W — a 96.8% difference. The Quadro P620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Quadro P620). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Quadro P620
TDP
115W
40W-65%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
240mm
145mm
Height
111mm
69mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
73°C
70°C-4%
Perf/Watt
170.0+84%
92.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 came in at $299, while the Quadro P620 launched at $170. On MSRP, Quadro P620 was 43.1% cheaper ($129 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 21.8 (Quadro P620) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 200% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2018).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Quadro P620
MSRP
$299
$170-43%
Performance per Dollar
65.4+200%
21.8
Codename
AD107
GP107
Release
May 18 2023
February 1 2018
Ranking
#84
#524

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.