G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅357.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 200.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌187.5% higher power demand at 115W vs 40W.
❌65.5% longer card at 240mm vs 145mm.

Quadro P620

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $129 less on MSRP ($170 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Draws 40W instead of 115W, a 75W reduction.
✅Measures 145mm instead of 240mm, a 95mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.8 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Quadro P620

2018

Why buy it

✅357.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 200.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $129 less on MSRP ($170 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Draws 40W instead of 115W, a 75W reduction.
✅Measures 145mm instead of 240mm, a 95mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌187.5% higher power demand at 115W vs 40W.
❌65.5% longer card at 240mm vs 145mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2018-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.8 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Quadro P620?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4060 averages 357.4% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 19,548 vs 3,698 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Quadro P620 is a 2018 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2018, 428.6% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 2 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 4060 is about 75.9% more expensive on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $170 MSRP, and you are getting 357.4% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 428.6% higher G3D Mark. Quadro P620 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Quadro P620 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Quadro P620 is 2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 3,698 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Benchmark Check

Quadro P620 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro P620
1080p
low	167 FPS	38 FPS
medium	152 FPS	23 FPS
high	134 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	9 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	25 FPS
medium	114 FPS	15 FPS
high	99 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	4 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	9 FPS
medium	74 FPS	6 FPS
high	62 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Quadro P620

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro P620
1080p
low	392 FPS	73 FPS
medium	334 FPS	46 FPS
high	268 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	21 FPS
1440p
low	240 FPS	21 FPS
medium	209 FPS	15 FPS
high	169 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	8 FPS
4K
low	119 FPS	6 FPS
medium	98 FPS	4 FPS
high	82 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Quadro P620

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro P620
1080p
low	812 FPS	166 FPS
medium	642 FPS	133 FPS
high	551 FPS	111 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	83 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	125 FPS
medium	443 FPS	100 FPS
high	379 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	62 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	83 FPS
medium	297 FPS	67 FPS
high	234 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	42 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Quadro P620

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro P620
1080p
low	746 FPS	147 FPS
medium	613 FPS	113 FPS
high	536 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	76 FPS
1440p
low	594 FPS	105 FPS
medium	486 FPS	83 FPS
high	421 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	52 FPS
4K
low	358 FPS	61 FPS
medium	308 FPS	47 FPS
high	285 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	220 FPS	25 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Quadro P620

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Quadro P620

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Quadro P620

The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Quadro P620's 3,698 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 428.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro P620 uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 512 (Quadro P620). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1443 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro P620
G3D Mark Score	19,548+429%	3,698
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	Pascal
Process Node	5 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	3072+500%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS+922%	1.478 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2460 MHz+70%	1443 MHz
ROPs	48+200%	16
TMUs	96+200%	32
L1 Cache	3 MB+1479%	0.19 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+2300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P620 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P620 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro P620
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P620 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1 MB (Quadro P620) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro P620
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	24 MB+2300%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (FL12_1) (Quadro P620). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro P620
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (FL12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P620). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro P620).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro P620
Encoder	NVENC 8th gen	NVENC (Pascal)
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Quadro P620's 40W — a 96.8% difference. The Quadro P620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Quadro P620). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 145mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 70°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Quadro P620
TDP	115W	40W-65%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	145mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	73°C	70°C-4%
Perf/Watt	170.0+84%	92.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Quadro P620 launched at $170. The Quadro P620 costs 43.1% less ($129 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 21.8 (Quadro P620) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 200% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).