
GeForce RTX 4060

Quadro RTX A6000
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro RTX A6000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro RTX A6000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro RTX A6000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,350 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1233.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 300W, a 185W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quadro RTX A6000
2020Why buy it
- ✅60.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅250% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 96).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌1454.8% HIGHER MSRP$4,649 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌160.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Quadro RTX A6000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Quadro RTX A6000
The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Quadro RTX A6000's 22,798 — the Quadro RTX A6000 leads by 16.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX A6000 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1800 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 84 (Quadro RTX A6000) with 96 Tensor cores vs 336.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548 | 22,798+17% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 10752+250% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS | 38.71 TFLOPS+156% |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+37% | 1800 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 112+133% |
| TMUs | 96 | 336+250% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 10.5 MB+250% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+300% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 84+250% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 336+250% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro RTX A6000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX A6000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX A6000 carries 48 GB. Quadro RTX A6000 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX A6000) — a 182.4% advantage for the Quadro RTX A6000. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 and 384-bit on the Quadro RTX A6000. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX A6000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 48 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 768 GB/s+182% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+300% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Quadro RTX A6000's 300W — a 89.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (Quadro RTX A6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin EPS. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-62% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin EPS |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-14% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+124% | 76.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 came in at $299, while the Quadro RTX A6000 launched at $4649. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 was 93.6% cheaper ($4350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4.9 (Quadro RTX A6000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 1234.7% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-94% | $4649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+1235% | 4.9 |
| Codename | AD107 | GA102 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | October 5 2020 |
| Ranking | #84 | #54 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














