
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX A6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,350 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1233.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 300W, a 185W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quadro RTX A6000
2020Why buy it
- ✅60.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅250% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 96).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌1454.8% HIGHER MSRP$4,649 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌160.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 115W.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Quadro RTX A6000
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,350 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1233.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 300W, a 185W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅60.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅250% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 96).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (96 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌1454.8% HIGHER MSRP$4,649 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌160.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 115W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro RTX A6000 better than GeForce RTX 4060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 4060 make more sense than Quadro RTX A6000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 331 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 261 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 158 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 929 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 759 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 675 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 716 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 586 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 256 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 855 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 784 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 684 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 616 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 513 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 256 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Quadro RTX A6000

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Quadro RTX A6000
Quadro RTX A6000
The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Quadro RTX A6000's 22,798 — the Quadro RTX A6000 leads by 16.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro RTX A6000 uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1800 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 84 (Quadro RTX A6000) with 96 Tensor cores vs 336.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548 | 22,798+17% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 10752+250% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS | 38.71 TFLOPS+156% |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+37% | 1800 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 112+133% |
| TMUs | 96 | 336+250% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 10.5 MB+250% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+300% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 84+250% |
| Tensor Cores | 96 | 336+250% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro RTX A6000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX A6000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 4060 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX A6000 has 48 GB. The Quadro RTX A6000 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX A6000) — a 182.4% advantage for the Quadro RTX A6000. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX A6000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 48 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 768 GB/s+182% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+300% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Quadro RTX A6000's 300W — a 89.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (Quadro RTX A6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin EPS. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-62% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin EPS |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-14% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+124% | 76.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX A6000 launched at $4649. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 93.6% less ($4350 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4.9 (Quadro RTX A6000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 1234.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-94% | $4649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+1235% | 4.9 |
| Codename | AD107 | GA102 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | October 5 2020 |
| Ranking | #84 | #54 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












