
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Quadro T1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅181.9% more average FPS across 42 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 302% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌130% higher power demand at 115W vs 50W.
- ❌53.8% longer card at 240mm vs 156mm.
Quadro T1000
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 115W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 240mm, a 84mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 42 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌33.8% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Quadro T1000
2019Why buy it
- ✅181.9% more average FPS across 42 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 302% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 115W, a 65W reduction.
- ✅Measures 156mm instead of 240mm, a 84mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌130% higher power demand at 115W vs 50W.
- ❌53.8% longer card at 240mm vs 156mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 42 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌33.8% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Quadro T1000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro T1000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 23 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 234 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 220 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 55 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 142 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 52 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Quadro T1000

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Quadro T1000's 6,505 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 200.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Quadro T1000 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+201% | 6,505 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+69% | 1455 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro T1000 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro T1000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T1000 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode (Quadro T1000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Quadro T1000's 50W — a 78.8% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Quadro T1000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 50W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 156mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | 65°C-11% |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+31% | 130.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Quadro T1000 launched at $400. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 25.3% less ($101 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 16.3 (Quadro T1000) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 301.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-25% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+301% | 16.3 |
| Codename | AD107 | TU117 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #84 | #376 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












