GeForce RTX 4060
Radeon 2100
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon 2100 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon 2100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon 2100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅14784.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 16135.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌130% higher power demand at 115W vs 50W.
Radeon 2100
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 115W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon 2100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Radeon 2100
The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon 2100's 60 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 32480%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon 2100 uses GCN 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 384 (Radeon 2100). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1024 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+32480% | 60 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+700% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+1821% | 0.7864 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+140% | 1024 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+500% | 8 |
| TMUs | 96+300% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+3233% | 0.09 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+18362% | 0.13 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon 2100 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 2100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 2100 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 and 64-bit on the Radeon 2100. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon 2100) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+1500% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+18362% | 0.13 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 9.0b (Radeon 2100). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+33% | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 4.6+130% | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs Avivo (Radeon 2100). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs Avivo. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon 2100).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | Avivo |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | Avivo |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon 2100's 50W — a 78.8% difference. The Radeon 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Radeon 2100). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 50W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+14067% | 1.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 came in at $299, while the Radeon 2100 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon 2100 was 50.2% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.4 (Radeon 2100) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 16250% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $149-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+16250% | 0.4 |
| Codename | AD107 | Polaris 24 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #84 | #898 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon 2100
