GeForce RTX 4060 vs RADEON 9200 SE

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

2023Core: 1830 MHzBoost: 2460 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON 9200 SE

2025Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 4060 vs RADEON 9200 SE Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs RADEON 9200 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs RADEON 9200 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

  • 14784.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 65277.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 3100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 256 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 109.1% higher power demand at 115W vs 55W.
  • 42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.

RADEON 9200 SE

2025

Why buy it

  • Costs $269 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • Draws 55W instead of 115W, a 60W reduction.
  • Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 14784.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 651500% in PassMark G3D (19,548 vs 3), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 256 MB of VRAM and native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while RADEON 9200 SE has no comparable frame-generation support. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $269 more expensive on MSRP at $299 vs $30, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 65277.9% (65.4 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs RADEON 9200 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

RADEON 9200 SE

The RADEON 9200 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the RADEON 9200 SE's 3 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 651500%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RADEON 9200 SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9200 SE). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9200 SE). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 40 (RADEON 9200 SE) with 96 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060RADEON 9200 SE
G3D Mark Score
19,548+651500%
3
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
5 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
3072+20%
2560
Compute (TFLOPS)
15.11 TFLOPS+2%
14.85 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2460 MHz
2900 MHz+18%
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
96
160+67%
L2 Cache
24 MB+200%
8 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
24
40+67%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RADEON 9200 SE does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9200 SE leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060RADEON 9200 SE
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9200 SE carries 256 MB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 3100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9200 SE. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9200 SE) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060RADEON 9200 SE
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+3100%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
24 MB+200%
8 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 8.1 (RADEON 9200 SE). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060RADEON 9200 SE
DirectX
12 Ultimate+48%
8.1
Vulkan
1.3
N/A
OpenGL
4.6+254%
1.3
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs None (RADEON 9200 SE). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs None. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2 (RADEON 9200 SE).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060RADEON 9200 SE
Encoder
NVENC 8th gen
None
Decoder
NVDEC 5th gen
None
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the RADEON 9200 SE's 55W — a 70.6% difference. The RADEON 9200 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (RADEON 9200 SE). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Legacy. Card length: 240mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 60.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060RADEON 9200 SE
TDP
115W
55W-52%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
8-pin
Legacy
Length
240mm
168mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
73°C
60-18%
Perf/Watt
170.0+169900%
0.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 came in at $299, while the RADEON 9200 SE launched at $30. On MSRP, RADEON 9200 SE was 90% cheaper ($269 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.1 (RADEON 9200 SE) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 65300% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9200 SE (2025 vs 2023).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060RADEON 9200 SE
MSRP
$299
$30-90%
Performance per Dollar
65.4+65300%
0.1
Codename
AD107
Strix Halo
Release
May 18 2023
January 6 2025
Ranking
#84
#98

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.