GeForce RTX 4060 vs RADEON 9250

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs RADEON 9250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs RADEON 9250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅14784.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 172061.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $79 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅3100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 256 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌21.1% higher power demand at 115W vs 95W.

RADEON 9250

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($79 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 115W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($79 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 14784.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 651500% in PassMark G3D (19,548 vs 3), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 256 MB of VRAM, native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while RADEON 9250 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and 24 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $220 more expensive on MSRP at $299 vs $79, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 172061.9% (65.4 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs RADEON 9250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

RADEON 9250

The RADEON 9250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the RADEON 9250's 3 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 651500%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the RADEON 9250 uses GCN 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,048 (RADEON 9250). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9250). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	RADEON 9250
G3D Mark Score	19,548+651500%	3
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 3.0
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3072+50%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS+269%	4.096 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2460 MHz+146%	1000 MHz
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	96	128+33%
L1 Cache	3 MB+500%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+4700%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RADEON 9250 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9250 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	RADEON 9250
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9250 carries 256 MB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 3100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9250. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.5 MB (RADEON 9250) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	RADEON 9250
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+3100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	24 MB+4700%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the RADEON 9250's 95W — a 19% difference. The RADEON 9250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (RADEON 9250). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	RADEON 9250
TDP	115W	95W-17%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	Legacy
Length	240mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	73°C	—
Perf/Watt	170.0	0.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 came in at $299, while the RADEON 9250 launched at $79. On MSRP, RADEON 9250 was 73.6% cheaper ($220 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.0 (RADEON 9250) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	RADEON 9250
MSRP	$299	$79-74%
Performance per Dollar	65.4	0.0
Codename	AD107	Amethyst
Release	May 18 2023	September 29 2015
Ranking	#84	#420

Search GeForce RTX 4060 on Amazon

Search RADEON 9250 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.