GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon HD 6770

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

2023Core: 1830 MHzBoost: 2460 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6770

2011Boost: 900 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon HD 6770 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon HD 6770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon HD 6770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

  • 1144.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 563.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 1 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 21.2% longer card at 240mm vs 198mm.

Radeon HD 6770

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $170 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • Measures 198mm instead of 240mm, a 42mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1144.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1438% in PassMark G3D (19,548 vs 1,271), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon HD 6770 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 40nm, and 24 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $170 more expensive on MSRP at $299 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 563.6% (65.4 vs 9.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon HD 6770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Radeon HD 6770

The Radeon HD 6770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The boost clock speed is 900 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,271 points. Launch price was $129.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon HD 6770's 1,271 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 1438%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon HD 6770 uses TeraScale 2, both on 5 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 800 (Radeon HD 6770). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6770). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 900 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon HD 6770
G3D Mark Score
19,548+1438%
1,271
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TeraScale 2
Process Node
5 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
3072+284%
800
Compute (TFLOPS)
15.11 TFLOPS+1011%
1.36 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2460 MHz+173%
900 MHz
ROPs
48+200%
16
TMUs
96+140%
40
L1 Cache
3 MB+3650%
0.08 MB
L2 Cache
24 MB+9500%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon HD 6770 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6770 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon HD 6770
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6770 carries 1 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6770. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 6770) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon HD 6770
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+700%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
272 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
24 MB+9500%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6770). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon HD 6770
DirectX
12 Ultimate+7%
11.2 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.3
N/A
OpenGL
4.6+5%
4.4
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs None (Radeon HD 6770). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 6770).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon HD 6770
Encoder
NVENC 8th gen
None
Decoder
NVDEC 5th gen
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon HD 6770's 108W — a 6.3% difference. The Radeon HD 6770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6770). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 198mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 75.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon HD 6770
TDP
115W
108W-6%
Recommended PSU
550W
450W-18%
Power Connector
8-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
240mm
198mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
73°C-3%
75
Perf/Watt
170.0+1341%
11.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 came in at $299, while the Radeon HD 6770 launched at $129. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6770 was 56.9% cheaper ($170 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 9.9 (Radeon HD 6770) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 560.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon HD 6770
MSRP
$299
$129-57%
Performance per Dollar
65.4+561%
9.9
Codename
AD107
Juniper
Release
May 18 2023
January 21 2011
Ranking
#84
#807

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.