
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅181.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 175.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 23.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌35.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 85W.
Radeon Pro 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 115W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌0.3% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Radeon Pro 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅181.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 175.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 23.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 115W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌35.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 85W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌0.3% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon Pro 5300?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5300 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon Pro 5300

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300
The Radeon Pro 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,125 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon Pro 5300's 7,125 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 174.4%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro 5300 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4.224 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1650 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+174% | 7,125 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+140% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+258% | 4.224 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+49% | 1650 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+20% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 5300 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5300 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5300 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5300) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5300).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon Pro 5300's 85W — a 30% difference. The Radeon Pro 5300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5300). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 85W-26% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+103% | 83.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5300 launched at $300. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 0.3% less ($1 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 23.8 (Radeon Pro 5300) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 174.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+175% | 23.8 |
| Codename | AD107 | Navi 14 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #84 | #351 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












