
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+109.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌130% higher power demand at 115W vs 50W.
Radeon Pro 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 115W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,324 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Radeon Pro 5600M
2020Why buy it
- ✅+109.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 115W, a 65W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌130% higher power demand at 115W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (9,324 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon Pro 5600M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5600M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 130 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 31 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 420 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 157 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 105 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 183 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon Pro 5600M

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
The Radeon Pro 5600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,324 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon Pro 5600M's 9,324 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 109.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro 5600M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5600M). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1030 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+110% | 9,324 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+20% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+186% | 5.274 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+139% | 1030 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 160+67% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+500% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 5600M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5600M) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+500% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5600M). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5600M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon Pro 5600M's 50W — a 78.8% difference. The Radeon Pro 5600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5600M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 90°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 50W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-19% | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0 | 186.5+10% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 5600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299 | — |
| Codename | AD107 | Navi 12 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | June 15 2020 |
| Ranking | #84 | #283 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












