
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 580X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+159.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $301 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 420.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro 580X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,540 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌100.7% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Radeon Pro 580X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+159.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $301 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 420.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,540 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌100.7% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon Pro 580X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 580X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 17 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 169 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 204 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 127 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 85 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 50 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon Pro 580X

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon Pro 580X
Radeon Pro 580X
The Radeon Pro 580X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 18 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,540 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon Pro 580X's 7,540 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 159.3%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro 580X uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580X). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580X). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+159% | 7,540 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+33% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+173% | 5.53 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz+105% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96 | 144+50% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+436% | 0.56 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro 580X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 580X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 580X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580X). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon Pro 580X's 150W — a 26.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 580X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-23% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-14% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+238% | 50.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 580X launched at $600. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 50.2% less ($301 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro 580X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 419% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon Pro 580X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-50% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+419% | 12.6 |
| Codename | AD107 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | March 18 2019 |
| Ranking | #84 | #339 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












