GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon PRO W6300

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon PRO W6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon PRO W6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅189.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 135.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 27.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌360% higher power demand at 115W vs 25W.

Radeon PRO W6300

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Draws 25W instead of 115W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.8 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 189.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 251.6% in PassMark G3D (19,548 vs 5,560), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon PRO W6300 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 6nm, and 24 vs 12 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $99 more expensive on MSRP at $299 vs $200, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 135.2% (65.4 vs 27.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon PRO W6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon PRO W6300

The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon PRO W6300's 5,560 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 251.6%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6300). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2040 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (Radeon PRO W6300) with 96 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W6300
G3D Mark Score	19,548+252%	5,560
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	3072+300%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS+382%	3.133 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2460 MHz+21%	2040 MHz
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	96+100%	48
L1 Cache	3 MB+1100%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+2300%	1 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	24+100%	12

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W6300 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W6300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W6300
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6300 carries 2 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 and 128-bit on the Radeon PRO W6300. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6300) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W6300
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	24 MB+2300%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon PRO W6300's 25W — a 128.6% difference. The Radeon PRO W6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Radeon PRO W6300). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W6300
TDP	115W	25W-78%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	73°C	—
Perf/Watt	170.0	222.4+31%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 came in at $299, while the Radeon PRO W6300 launched at $200. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W6300 was 33.1% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 27.8 (Radeon PRO W6300) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 135.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2022).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W6300
MSRP	$299	$200-33%
Performance per Dollar	65.4+135%	27.8
Codename	AD107	Navi 24
Release	May 18 2023	January 19 2022
Ranking	#84	#413

Search GeForce RTX 4060 on Amazon

Search Radeon PRO W6300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.