
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6600X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅+49.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 248.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,113 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌133.8% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Radeon PRO W6600X
2021Why buy it
- ✅+49.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $400 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 248.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 18.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $699 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,113 vs 19,548).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌133.8% HIGHER MSRP$699 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.8 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($699 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon PRO W6600X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO W6600X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 134 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 268 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 211 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 141 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 812 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 642 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 551 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 443 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 379 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 329 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 365 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 297 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 148 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 590 FPS |
| medium | 613 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 536 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 440 FPS | 295 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 594 FPS | 443 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 421 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 308 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 285 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 220 FPS | 148 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon PRO W6600X

GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon PRO W6600X
Radeon PRO W6600X
The Radeon PRO W6600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2479 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,113 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 13,113 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 49.1%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W6600X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,048 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 10.15 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600X). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2479 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 32 (Radeon PRO W6600X) with 96 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548+49% | 13,113 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+50% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS+49% | 10.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz | 2479 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 128+33% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 32+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W6600X lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6600X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600X) — a 21.4% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s+21% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+1100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600X). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W6600X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon PRO W6600X's 120W — a 4.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-4% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-3% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+56% | 109.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6600X launched at $699. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 57.2% less ($400 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 18.8 (Radeon PRO W6600X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 247.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon PRO W6600X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-57% | $699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+248% | 18.8 |
| Codename | AD107 | Navi 23 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #84 | #197 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












