G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 183.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 23.1 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 115W instead of 190W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon PRO W7700

2023

Why buy it

✅23.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
234.1% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.1 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌65.2% higher power demand at 190W vs 115W.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Radeon PRO W7700

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 183.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 23.1 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 115W instead of 190W, a 75W reduction.

Why buy it

✅23.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌
234.1% HIGHER MSRP
$999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.1 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌65.2% higher power demand at 190W vs 115W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon PRO W7700 better than GeForce RTX 4060?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7700 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 23.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 18% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 16 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon PRO W7700 is about 234.1% more expensive on MSRP at $999 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and you are getting 23.9% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 18.0% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 4060 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon PRO W7700 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 4060 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

When does GeForce RTX 4060 make more sense than Radeon PRO W7700?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (115W vs 190W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $299 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon PRO W7700. The trade-off is that Radeon PRO W7700 currently gives you 18.0% higher G3D Mark and 23.9% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 4060 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7700
1080p
low	167 FPS	223 FPS
medium	152 FPS	205 FPS
high	134 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	163 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	201 FPS
medium	114 FPS	167 FPS
high	99 FPS	139 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	130 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	136 FPS
medium	74 FPS	114 FPS
high	62 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	84 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon PRO W7700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7700
1080p
low	392 FPS	561 FPS
medium	334 FPS	462 FPS
high	268 FPS	360 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	302 FPS
1440p
low	240 FPS	369 FPS
medium	209 FPS	305 FPS
high	169 FPS	248 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	210 FPS
4K
low	119 FPS	168 FPS
medium	98 FPS	138 FPS
high	82 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	91 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon PRO W7700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7700
1080p
low	812 FPS	911 FPS
medium	642 FPS	741 FPS
high	551 FPS	644 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	519 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	704 FPS
medium	443 FPS	567 FPS
high	379 FPS	481 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	389 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	492 FPS
medium	297 FPS	395 FPS
high	234 FPS	329 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	259 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon PRO W7700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7700
1080p
low	746 FPS	785 FPS
medium	613 FPS	653 FPS
high	536 FPS	591 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	506 FPS
1440p
low	594 FPS	622 FPS
medium	486 FPS	517 FPS
high	421 FPS	463 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	389 FPS
4K
low	358 FPS	399 FPS
medium	308 FPS	346 FPS
high	285 FPS	318 FPS
ultra	220 FPS	259 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon PRO W7700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon PRO W7700

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon PRO W7700

The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon PRO W7700's 23,062 — the Radeon PRO W7700 leads by 18%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7700 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 48 (Radeon PRO W7700) with 96 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7700
G3D Mark Score	19,548	23,062+18%
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	3072	3072
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS	31.95 TFLOPS+111%
Boost Clock	2460 MHz	2600 MHz+6%
ROPs	48	96+100%
TMUs	96	192+100%
L1 Cache	3 MB+300%	0.75 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+1100%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	24	48+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7700
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7700 has 16 GB. The Radeon PRO W7700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7700) — a 58.8% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7700. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7700) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7700
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	272 GB/s	432 GB/s+59%
Bus Width	128-bit	192-bit+50%
L2 Cache	24 MB+1100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7700
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7700
Encoder	NVENC 8th gen	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon PRO W7700's 190W — a 49.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 550W (Radeon PRO W7700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7700
TDP	115W-39%	190W
Recommended PSU	550W	550W
Power Connector	8-pin	1x 8-pin
Length	240mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	73°C-9%	80°C
Perf/Watt	170.0+40%	121.4

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7700 launched at $999. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 70.1% less ($700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 23.1 (Radeon PRO W7700) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 183.1% better value.