G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,200 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 501.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 115W instead of 260W, a 145W reduction.
✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon PRO W7800

2023

Why buy it

✅50.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌
735.8% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌126.1% higher power demand at 260W vs 115W.
❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Radeon PRO W7800

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,200 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 501.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 10.9 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 115W instead of 260W, a 145W reduction.
✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅50.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7800 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌
735.8% HIGHER MSRP
$2,499 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.9 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌126.1% higher power demand at 260W vs 115W.
❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon PRO W7800 better than GeForce RTX 4060?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7800 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 50.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 39% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 32 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon PRO W7800 is about 735.8% more expensive on MSRP at $2,499 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and you are getting 50.3% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 39.0% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 4060 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon PRO W7800 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 4060 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

When does GeForce RTX 4060 make more sense than Radeon PRO W7800?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (115W vs 260W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $299 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon PRO W7800. The trade-off is that Radeon PRO W7800 currently gives you 39.0% higher G3D Mark and 50.3% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 4060 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7800 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7800
1080p
low	167 FPS	225 FPS
medium	152 FPS	210 FPS
high	134 FPS	184 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	168 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	203 FPS
medium	114 FPS	171 FPS
high	99 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	134 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	138 FPS
medium	74 FPS	115 FPS
high	62 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	87 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon PRO W7800

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7800
1080p
low	392 FPS	619 FPS
medium	334 FPS	508 FPS
high	268 FPS	383 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	329 FPS
1440p
low	240 FPS	450 FPS
medium	209 FPS	371 FPS
high	169 FPS	300 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	247 FPS
4K
low	119 FPS	246 FPS
medium	98 FPS	206 FPS
high	82 FPS	184 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	151 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon PRO W7800

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7800
1080p
low	812 FPS	918 FPS
medium	642 FPS	762 FPS
high	551 FPS	676 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	580 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	709 FPS
medium	443 FPS	583 FPS
high	379 FPS	505 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	427 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	497 FPS
medium	297 FPS	411 FPS
high	234 FPS	350 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	291 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon PRO W7800

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7800
1080p
low	746 FPS	881 FPS
medium	613 FPS	732 FPS
high	536 FPS	671 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	583 FPS
1440p
low	594 FPS	692 FPS
medium	486 FPS	577 FPS
high	421 FPS	512 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	445 FPS
4K
low	358 FPS	472 FPS
medium	308 FPS	405 FPS
high	285 FPS	366 FPS
ultra	220 FPS	306 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon PRO W7800

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon PRO W7800

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon PRO W7800

The Radeon PRO W7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1895 MHz to 2525 MHz. It has 4480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27,180 points. Launch price was $2,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 27,180 — the Radeon PRO W7800 leads by 39%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7800 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 4,480 (Radeon PRO W7800). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 45.25 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7800). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2525 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 70 (Radeon PRO W7800) with 96 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7800
G3D Mark Score	19,548	27,180+39%
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	3072	4480+46%
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS	45.25 TFLOPS+199%
Boost Clock	2460 MHz	2525 MHz+3%
ROPs	48	128+167%
TMUs	96	280+192%
L1 Cache	3 MB+50%	2 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+300%	6 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	24	70+192%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7800 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7800 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7800
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7800 has 32 GB. The Radeon PRO W7800 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7800) — a 111.8% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7800. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7800) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7800
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	32 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	272 GB/s	576 GB/s+112%
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	24 MB+300%	6 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7800
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7800). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7800).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7800
Encoder	NVENC 8th gen	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon PRO W7800's 260W — a 77.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 650W (Radeon PRO W7800). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7800
TDP	115W-56%	260W
Recommended PSU	550W-15%	650W
Power Connector	8-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	240mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	73°C-9%	80°C
Perf/Watt	170.0+63%	104.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7800 launched at $2499. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 88% less ($2200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 10.9 (Radeon PRO W7800) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 500% better value.