G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 826.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 115W instead of 295W, a 180W reduction.
✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon PRO W7900

2023

Why buy it

✅64.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌
1237.5% HIGHER MSRP
$3,999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌156.5% higher power demand at 295W vs 115W.
❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Radeon PRO W7900

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 826.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅Draws 115W instead of 295W, a 180W reduction.
✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅64.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌
1237.5% HIGHER MSRP
$3,999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
❌156.5% higher power demand at 295W vs 115W.
❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon PRO W7900 better than GeForce RTX 4060?

Yes. Radeon PRO W7900 is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 64.9% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data, 44.3% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 48 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon PRO W7900 is about 1237.5% more expensive on MSRP at $3,999 MSRP versus $299 MSRP, and you are getting 64.9% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 44.3% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 4060 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon PRO W7900 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 4060 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

When does GeForce RTX 4060 make more sense than Radeon PRO W7900?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (115W vs 295W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $299 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon PRO W7900. The trade-off is that Radeon PRO W7900 currently gives you 44.3% higher G3D Mark and 64.9% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 4060 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W7900 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	167 FPS	262 FPS
medium	152 FPS	242 FPS
high	134 FPS	210 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	183 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	246 FPS
medium	114 FPS	205 FPS
high	99 FPS	167 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	150 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	174 FPS
medium	74 FPS	145 FPS
high	62 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	100 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon PRO W7900

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	392 FPS	813 FPS
medium	334 FPS	639 FPS
high	268 FPS	471 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	405 FPS
1440p
low	240 FPS	617 FPS
medium	209 FPS	495 FPS
high	169 FPS	382 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	307 FPS
4K
low	119 FPS	320 FPS
medium	98 FPS	256 FPS
high	82 FPS	225 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	191 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon PRO W7900

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	812 FPS	945 FPS
medium	642 FPS	775 FPS
high	551 FPS	690 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	595 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	714 FPS
medium	443 FPS	587 FPS
high	379 FPS	511 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	432 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	498 FPS
medium	297 FPS	412 FPS
high	234 FPS	358 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	292 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon PRO W7900

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7900
1080p
low	746 FPS	946 FPS
medium	613 FPS	801 FPS
high	536 FPS	714 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	621 FPS
1440p
low	594 FPS	714 FPS
medium	486 FPS	604 FPS
high	421 FPS	525 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	456 FPS
4K
low	358 FPS	505 FPS
medium	308 FPS	437 FPS
high	285 FPS	386 FPS
ultra	220 FPS	317 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon PRO W7900

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon PRO W7900

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon PRO W7900

The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 28,211 — the Radeon PRO W7900 leads by 44.3%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900) with 96 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7900
G3D Mark Score	19,548	28,211+44%
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	5 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	3072	6144+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS	61.32 TFLOPS+306%
Boost Clock	2460 MHz	2495 MHz+1%
ROPs	48	192+300%
TMUs	96	384+300%
L1 Cache	3 MB	3 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+300%	6 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	24	96+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7900 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7900 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7900
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 has 48 GB. The Radeon PRO W7900 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) — a 217.6% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7900
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	48 GB+500%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	272 GB/s	864 GB/s+218%
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	24 MB+300%	6 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7900
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7900
Encoder	NVENC 8th gen	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 87.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon PRO W7900
TDP	115W-61%	295W
Recommended PSU	550W-27%	750W
Power Connector	8-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	240mm	267mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2-33%	3
Temp (Load)	73°C-9%	80°C
Perf/Watt	170.0+78%	95.6

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 92.5% less ($3700 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 7.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 821.1% better value.