
GeForce RTX 4060

Radeon PRO W7900
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon PRO W7900 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon PRO W7900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 4060
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,700 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 826.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 295W, a 180W reduction.
- ✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon PRO W7900
2023Why buy it
- ✅64.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌1237.5% HIGHER MSRP$3,999 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
- ❌156.5% higher power demand at 295W vs 115W.
- ❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon PRO W7900
The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 28,211 — the Radeon PRO W7900 leads by 44.3%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900) with 96 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 19,548 | 28,211+44% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 6144+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 15.11 TFLOPS | 61.32 TFLOPS+306% |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz | 2495 MHz+1% |
| ROPs | 48 | 192+300% |
| TMUs | 96 | 384+300% |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+300% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24 | 96+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W7900 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7900 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 carries 48 GB. Radeon PRO W7900 gives you 500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) — a 217.6% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 and 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 48 GB+500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 864 GB/s+218% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 24 MB+300% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 87.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-61% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-27% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 240mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 73°C-9% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 170.0+78% | 95.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 came in at $299, while the Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 was 92.5% cheaper ($3700 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 7.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 821.1% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $299-93% | $3999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 65.4+821% | 7.1 |
| Codename | AD107 | Navi 31 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #84 | #26 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














