G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅+784.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 489% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌76.9% higher power demand at 115W vs 65W.
❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 115W, a 50W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,209 vs 19,548).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Radeon Pro WX 3200

2019

Why buy it

✅+784.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 489% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 115W, a 50W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌76.9% higher power demand at 115W vs 65W.
❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,209 vs 19,548).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon Pro WX 3200?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 19,548 vs 2,209 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a 2019 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019, 784.9% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 4 GB, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 4060 is about 50.3% more expensive on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and you are getting 784.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro WX 3200 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon Pro WX 3200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 2019 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 2,209 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro WX 3200 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon Pro WX 3200
1080p
low	167 FPS	53 FPS
medium	152 FPS	34 FPS
high	134 FPS	25 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	12 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	36 FPS
medium	114 FPS	22 FPS
high	99 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	11 FPS
medium	74 FPS	7 FPS
high	62 FPS	5 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon Pro WX 3200

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon Pro WX 3200
1080p
low	392 FPS	83 FPS
medium	334 FPS	51 FPS
high	268 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	23 FPS
1440p
low	240 FPS	25 FPS
medium	209 FPS	18 FPS
high	169 FPS	13 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	9 FPS
4K
low	119 FPS	7 FPS
medium	98 FPS	5 FPS
high	82 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	3 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon Pro WX 3200

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon Pro WX 3200
1080p
low	812 FPS	99 FPS
medium	642 FPS	80 FPS
high	551 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	50 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	75 FPS
medium	443 FPS	60 FPS
high	379 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	50 FPS
medium	297 FPS	40 FPS
high	234 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	25 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon Pro WX 3200

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon Pro WX 3200
1080p
low	746 FPS	99 FPS
medium	613 FPS	80 FPS
high	536 FPS	66 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	50 FPS
1440p
low	594 FPS	75 FPS
medium	486 FPS	60 FPS
high	421 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	37 FPS
4K
low	358 FPS	50 FPS
medium	308 FPS	40 FPS
high	285 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	220 FPS	25 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon Pro WX 3200

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon Pro WX 3200

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon Pro WX 3200

The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 2 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1082 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,209 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon Pro WX 3200's 2,209 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 784.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses GCN 4.0, both on 5 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 640 (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1.385 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3200).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon Pro WX 3200
G3D Mark Score	19,548+785%	2,209
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 4.0
Process Node	5 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	3072+380%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS+991%	1.385 TFLOPS
ROPs	48+200%	16
TMUs	96+200%	32
L1 Cache	3 MB+1775%	0.16 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+4700%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon Pro WX 3200) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon Pro WX 3200
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	24 MB+4700%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon Pro WX 3200
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Radeon Pro WX 3200).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon Pro WX 3200
Encoder	NVENC 8th gen	VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon Pro WX 3200's 65W — a 55.6% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 82°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon Pro WX 3200
TDP	115W	65W-43%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	240mm	168mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	73°C-11%	82°C
Perf/Watt	170.0+400%	34.0

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro WX 3200 launched at $199. The Radeon Pro WX 3200 costs 33.4% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 11.1 (Radeon Pro WX 3200) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 489.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).