GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon R5 435

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

2023Core: 1830 MHzBoost: 2460 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 435

2016Core: 780 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon R5 435 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon R5 435 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon R5 435: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

  • 1796.1% more average FPS across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 586.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 9.5 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 283.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 30W.
  • 42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.

Radeon R5 435

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $219 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 115W, a 85W reduction.
  • Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.5 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1796.1% in average FPS across 44 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2465.4% in PassMark G3D (19,548 vs 762), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon R5 435 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and 24 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $219 more expensive on MSRP at $299 vs $80, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 586.4% (65.4 vs 9.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon R5 435 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Radeon R5 435

The Radeon R5 435 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 762 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon R5 435's 762 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 2465.4%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R5 435 uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 320 (Radeon R5 435). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 435). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1030 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R5 435
G3D Mark Score
19,548+2465%
762
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GCN 1.0
Process Node
5 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
3072+860%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
15.11 TFLOPS+2192%
0.6592 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2460 MHz+139%
1030 MHz
ROPs
48+500%
8
TMUs
96+380%
20
L1 Cache
3 MB+3650%
0.08 MB
L2 Cache
24 MB+18362%
0.13 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon R5 435 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 435 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R5 435
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 435 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 435. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon R5 435) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R5 435
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+1500%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
272 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
24 MB+18362%
0.13 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon R5 435). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R5 435
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 (FL 11_1)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 435). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R5 435).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R5 435
Encoder
NVENC 8th gen
VCE 1.0
Decoder
NVDEC 5th gen
UVD 3.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon R5 435's 30W — a 117.2% difference. The Radeon R5 435 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Radeon R5 435). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R5 435
TDP
115W
30W-74%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
240mm
168mm
Height
111mm
69mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
73°C
Perf/Watt
170.0+569%
25.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 came in at $299, while the Radeon R5 435 launched at $80. On MSRP, Radeon R5 435 was 73.2% cheaper ($219 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 9.5 (Radeon R5 435) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 588.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R5 435
MSRP
$299
$80-73%
Performance per Dollar
65.4+588%
9.5
Codename
AD107
Jet
Release
May 18 2023
May 15 2016
Ranking
#84
#922

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.