G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅1353.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 453.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌76.9% higher power demand at 115W vs 65W.
❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.

Radeon R7 250

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $210 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 115W, a 50W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Radeon R7 250

2013

Why buy it

✅1353.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 453.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Costs $210 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 115W, a 50W reduction.
✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌76.9% higher power demand at 115W vs 65W.
❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($89 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon R7 250?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4060 averages 1353.5% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 19,548 vs 1,051 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon R7 250 is a 2013 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2013, 1759.9% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 8 GB instead of 2 GB, and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce RTX 4060 is about 236.0% more expensive on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $89 MSRP, and you are getting 1353.5% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1759.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon R7 250 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Radeon R7 250 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon R7 250 is 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM, 1,051 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Benchmark Check

Radeon R7 250 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon R7 250
1080p
low	167 FPS	13 FPS
medium	152 FPS	8 FPS
high	134 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	3 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	7 FPS
medium	114 FPS	4 FPS
high	99 FPS	2 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	1 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	3 FPS
medium	74 FPS	2 FPS
high	62 FPS	1 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	1 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon R7 250

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon R7 250
1080p
low	392 FPS	47 FPS
medium	334 FPS	27 FPS
high	268 FPS	19 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	13 FPS
1440p
low	240 FPS	15 FPS
medium	209 FPS	9 FPS
high	169 FPS	6 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	5 FPS
4K
low	119 FPS	5 FPS
medium	98 FPS	3 FPS
high	82 FPS	2 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	2 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon R7 250

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon R7 250
1080p
low	812 FPS	47 FPS
medium	642 FPS	38 FPS
high	551 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	24 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	35 FPS
medium	443 FPS	28 FPS
high	379 FPS	24 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	18 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	24 FPS
medium	297 FPS	19 FPS
high	234 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	12 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon R7 250

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon R7 250
1080p
low	746 FPS	47 FPS
medium	613 FPS	38 FPS
high	536 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	24 FPS
1440p
low	594 FPS	35 FPS
medium	486 FPS	28 FPS
high	421 FPS	21 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	14 FPS
4K
low	358 FPS	21 FPS
medium	308 FPS	14 FPS
high	285 FPS	11 FPS
ultra	220 FPS	7 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon R7 250

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon R7 250

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon R7 250

The Radeon R7 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,051 points. Launch price was $89.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon R7 250's 1,051 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 1759.9%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R7 250 uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 384 (Radeon R7 250). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 250). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1050 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon R7 250
G3D Mark Score	19,548+1760%	1,051
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 1.0
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3072+700%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS+1774%	0.8064 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2460 MHz+134%	1050 MHz
ROPs	48+500%	8
TMUs	96+300%	24
L1 Cache	3 MB+3233%	0.09 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+9500%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R7 250 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R7 250 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon R7 250
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 250 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 250) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon R7 250
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	272 GB/s	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	24 MB+9500%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 11.1 (Radeon R7 250). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon R7 250
DirectX	12 Ultimate+8%	11.1
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+100%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 250). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4 (Radeon R7 250).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon R7 250
Encoder	NVENC 8th gen	VCE 1.0
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	UVD 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon R7 250's 65W — a 55.6% difference. The Radeon R7 250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 300W (Radeon R7 250). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 240mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 75.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon R7 250
TDP	115W	65W-43%
Recommended PSU	550W	300W-45%
Power Connector	8-pin	None
Length	240mm	168mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	73°C-3%	75
Perf/Watt	170.0+949%	16.2

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Radeon R7 250 launched at $89. The Radeon R7 250 costs 70.2% less ($210 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 11.8 (Radeon R7 250) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 454.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).