GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon R7 M260X

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

2023Core: 1830 MHzBoost: 2460 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M260X

2015Core: 620 MHzBoost: 715 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon R7 M260X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon R7 M260X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon R7 M260X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

  • 1428.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 797.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 7.3 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 53.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 75W.

Radeon R7 M260X

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $160 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 115W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.3 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1428.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1829.7% in PassMark G3D (19,548 vs 1,013), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon R7 M260X has no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and 24 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $160 more expensive on MSRP at $299 vs $139, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 797.1% (65.4 vs 7.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon R7 M260X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Radeon R7 M260X

The Radeon R7 M260X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,013 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon R7 M260X's 1,013 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 1829.7%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R7 M260X uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M260X). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260X). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 715 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R7 M260X
G3D Mark Score
19,548+1830%
1,013
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GCN 1.0
Process Node
5 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
3072+700%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
15.11 TFLOPS+2652%
0.5491 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2460 MHz+244%
715 MHz
ROPs
48+500%
8
TMUs
96+300%
24
L1 Cache
3 MB+3233%
0.09 MB
L2 Cache
24 MB+9500%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon R7 M260X does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 M260X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R7 M260X
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M260X carries 4 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M260X. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 M260X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R7 M260X
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
272 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
24 MB+9500%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M260X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R7 M260X
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 (11_1)
Vulkan
1.3
N/A
OpenGL
4.6+7%
4.3
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R7 M260X). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC (Radeon R7 M260X).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R7 M260X
Encoder
NVENC 8th gen
VCE 1.0
Decoder
NVDEC 5th gen
UVD 3.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon R7 M260X's 75W — a 42.1% difference. The Radeon R7 M260X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M260X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 85.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R7 M260X
TDP
115W
75W-35%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
8-pin
Mobile
Length
240mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
73°C-14%
85
Perf/Watt
170.0+1159%
13.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 came in at $299, while the Radeon R7 M260X launched at $139. On MSRP, Radeon R7 M260X was 53.5% cheaper ($160 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 7.3 (Radeon R7 M260X) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 795.9% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R7 M260X
MSRP
$299
$139-54%
Performance per Dollar
65.4+796%
7.3
Codename
AD107
Opal
Release
May 18 2023
December 6 2015
Ranking
#84
#878

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.