G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅58.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1022.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon R9 295X2

2014

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
401.3% HIGHER MSRP
$1,499 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Radeon R9 295X2

2014

Why buy it

✅58.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,200 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1022.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Poor future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
401.3% HIGHER MSRP
$1,499 MSRPvs$299 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 65.4 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Radeon R9 295X2?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. GeForce RTX 4060 averages 58.5% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 19,548 vs 8,734 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4060 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while Radeon R9 295X2 is a 2014 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2014, 123.8% more raw performance headroom, better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 28nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 4060 is about $1,200 cheaper on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $1,499 MSRP, and you are getting 58.5% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 123.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 1022.1%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Radeon R9 295X2 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon R9 295X2 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $1,499 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 4060 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 4060 Benchmark Check

Radeon R9 295X2 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon R9 295X2
1080p
low	167 FPS	105 FPS
medium	152 FPS	89 FPS
high	134 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	49 FPS
1440p
low	137 FPS	89 FPS
medium	114 FPS	75 FPS
high	99 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	36 FPS
4K
low	86 FPS	36 FPS
medium	74 FPS	32 FPS
high	62 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	55 FPS	17 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon R9 295X2

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon R9 295X2
1080p
low	392 FPS	193 FPS
medium	334 FPS	169 FPS
high	268 FPS	141 FPS
ultra	211 FPS	110 FPS
1440p
low	240 FPS	137 FPS
medium	209 FPS	111 FPS
high	169 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	68 FPS
4K
low	119 FPS	63 FPS
medium	98 FPS	53 FPS
high	82 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	39 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon R9 295X2

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon R9 295X2
1080p
low	812 FPS	393 FPS
medium	642 FPS	314 FPS
high	551 FPS	262 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	197 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	295 FPS
medium	443 FPS	236 FPS
high	379 FPS	197 FPS
ultra	329 FPS	147 FPS
4K
low	365 FPS	197 FPS
medium	297 FPS	157 FPS
high	234 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	98 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon R9 295X2

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon R9 295X2
1080p
low	746 FPS	240 FPS
medium	613 FPS	207 FPS
high	536 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	440 FPS	143 FPS
1440p
low	594 FPS	179 FPS
medium	486 FPS	155 FPS
high	421 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	98 FPS
4K
low	358 FPS	103 FPS
medium	308 FPS	82 FPS
high	285 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	220 FPS	50 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 4060 Open Radeon R9 295X2

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 and Radeon R9 295X2

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon R9 295X2

The Radeon R9 295X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 29 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1018 MHz. It has 2816 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 500W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,734 points. Launch price was $1,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon R9 295X2's 8,734 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 123.8%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R9 295X2 uses GCN 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 2,816 (Radeon R9 295X2). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 5.733 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon R9 295X2). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 1018 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon R9 295X2
G3D Mark Score	19,548+124%	8,734
Architecture	Ada Lovelace	GCN 2.0
Process Node	5 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3072+9%	2816 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)	15.11 TFLOPS+164%	5.733 TFLOPS ×2
Boost Clock	2460 MHz+142%	1018 MHz
ROPs	48	64 ×2+33%
TMUs	96	176 ×2+83%
L1 Cache	3 MB+335%	0.69 MB
L2 Cache	24 MB+2300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 295X2 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 295X2 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon R9 295X2
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 320 GB/s x2 (Radeon R9 295X2) — a 1077.2% advantage for the Radeon R9 295X2. Bus width: 128-bit vs 512-bit x2. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1 MB (Radeon R9 295X2) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon R9 295X2
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	272 GB/s	320 GB/s x2+18%
Bus Width	128-bit	512-bit x2+300%
L2 Cache	24 MB+2300%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 295X2). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon R9 295X2
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.0
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6+7%	4.3
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 295X2). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Radeon R9 295X2).

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon R9 295X2
Encoder	NVENC 8th gen	VCE 2.0
Decoder	NVDEC 5th gen	UVD 4.2
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon R9 295X2's 500W — a 125.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1000W (Radeon R9 295X2). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 240mm vs 307mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 65°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 4060	Radeon R9 295X2
TDP	115W-77%	500W
Recommended PSU	550W-45%	1000W
Power Connector	8-pin	2x 8-pin
Length	240mm	307mm
Height	111mm	114mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	73°C	65°C-11%
Perf/Watt	170.0+871%	17.5

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 295X2 launched at $1499. The GeForce RTX 4060 costs 80.1% less ($1200 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 5.8 (Radeon R9 295X2) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 1027.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).