GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon R9 M275

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

2023Core: 1830 MHzBoost: 2460 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M275

2014Core: 900 MHzBoost: 925 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon R9 M275 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon R9 M275 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon R9 M275: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

  • 1083.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $1 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1659% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 3.7 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 53.3% higher power demand at 115W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M275

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 75W instead of 115W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 0.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$299 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 4060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1083.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1653.2% in PassMark G3D (19,548 vs 1,115), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, native frame generation with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon R9 M275 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and 24 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 4060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 cheaper on MSRP at $299 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1659% (65.4 vs 3.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 4060 vs Radeon R9 M275 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Radeon R9 M275

The Radeon R9 M275 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $799.99.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 scores 19,548 versus the Radeon R9 M275's 1,115 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 1653.2%. The GeForce RTX 4060 is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon R9 M275 uses GCN 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275). Raw compute: 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275). Boost clocks: 2460 MHz vs 925 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R9 M275
G3D Mark Score
19,548+1653%
1,115
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
GCN 1.0
Process Node
5 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
3072+380%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
15.11 TFLOPS+1176%
1.184 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2460 MHz+166%
925 MHz
ROPs
48+200%
16
TMUs
96+140%
40
L1 Cache
3 MB+1775%
0.16 MB
L2 Cache
24 MB+9500%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon R9 M275 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M275 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R9 M275
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M275 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 272 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 64 GB/s (Radeon R9 M275) — a 325% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M275. L2 Cache: 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M275) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R9 M275
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+1500%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
272 GB/s+325%
64 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
24 MB+9500%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 12 (FL11_1) (Radeon R9 M275). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R9 M275
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 (FL11_1)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6+12%
4.1
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060) vs UVD3 (Radeon R9 M275). Decoder: NVDEC 5th gen vs VCE. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,Flash (Radeon R9 M275).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R9 M275
Encoder
NVENC 8th gen
UVD3
Decoder
NVDEC 5th gen
VCE
Codecs
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,Flash
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W versus the Radeon R9 M275's 75W — a 42.1% difference. The Radeon R9 M275 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 73°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R9 M275
TDP
115W
75W-35%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
8-pin
Mobile
Length
240mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
73°C-9%
80°C
Perf/Watt
170.0+1041%
14.9
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 4060 came in at $299, while the Radeon R9 M275 launched at $300. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 4060 was 0.3% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) vs 3.7 (Radeon R9 M275) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 1667.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce RTX 4060Radeon R9 M275
MSRP
$299
$300
Performance per Dollar
65.4+1668%
3.7
Codename
AD107
Venus
Release
May 18 2023
January 28 2014
Ranking
#84
#851

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.